“O
ur previous home was in not far away, also in Clapham, south London,” says Sally. “But we
needed more space, and we had been looking on this road. The house had been on the market for a while and was well-kept, but we wanted to put our stamp on it.” This handsome, double-fronted Edwardian home already had fie bedrooms and an unusually large garden, despite being semi- detached. Yet Sally and Tom, who were hoping for a third child, had very clear ideas about what they needed from their new home; room to grow, and more light. Although Sally and Tom work as lawyers, they
are also experienced renovators, with three previous projects under their belts. We were pretty confident, says Sally.
“We knew we would have to rewire, replumb, replaster and change the shape of the rooms. We also wanted a perfect finish. Friends recommended London practice Draw Architecture, and the couple’s brief made it clear a large kitchen, dining and family area were essential features for how they wanted to live in the house. Working from that point, ideas evolved, but it was architect Seamus Shanks at Draw who came up with the concept of creating a sunken sitting area within the open-plan kitchen and dining room. “I just love it!” says Sally.
Almost no part of the original house was left untouched, as they needed “lots of living space,” asserts Sally. “There was no basement or cellar, so we used every nook and cranny and built-in maximum storage.” As a result, the
30
www.sbhonline.co.uk
rooine was raised to allow for three bedrooms on the second oor making si in total, almost every wall was moved, and two extensions were added one on the ground oor to create the open plan space, and one on the first oor. “There wasn’t a lot [of the original] house left,” admits Sally. “Just the front and sides and the stairs. You could stand inside and see the sky.” Before any of this work could begin, Tom and Sally needed to get planning permission, and this was not straightforward. “Draw [Architecture] were very good,” says
Sally. “We got planning permission to add a pod. ts a glass bo on the first oor at the back of the house, maybe 3 m x 1 m, but it makes a world of difference to the bedroom. It feels so spacious now.” This planning application was reected at first, but the couple was able to get permission on appeal.
The other part of their application was even
more complex. Their plans for a large rear extension to house the new kitchen and dining area were rejected. However, Tom and Sally were lucky to find eidence the house was originally built with a type of conservatory attached at the rear. The size and position of this historic structure meant they were able to get their desired extension under permitted development rules. “We got everything we wanted in the end,” says Sally. The property’s rear extension is built
entirely in masonry, with 100 mm of Styrofoam insulation. Unlike the traditional ‘pretty’ frontage, the extension has a chic and contemporary black zinc finish. ot only is this hard-wearing and practical, but it creates a clear
jul/aug 2023
HIGH POINT
“The end of the build when it all finally came together. I looked around and just said ‘wow’.”
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76