search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
30 CASE STUDY


factory produced elements incorporating insulated roof panels, spandrel wall panels, dormers, roof windows, dummy chimneys, soffits and fascias – all deliv- ered to site and craned into place, with the roof then just requiring tiling. “At a time when skills shortage and


tight margins are commonplace across the sector, the offsite fabrication of the roofs at Plumb Park provided TaylorWimpey with huge benefits in terms of health and safety, speed of construction and quality control,” says Kevin Sherlock, managing director at Smartroof. He adds: “To create the curved structure would have been complicated to achieve onsite, using traditional roofing methods, however we were able to manufacture this complex configuration offsite.” Sherlock estimates that, for this bespoke design, the system saved up to eight weeks installation time when compared to traditional onsite methods of roof construction. In addition, hips, valleys and other roof details could all be designed and manufactured as features within the system.


“THE END RESULTWAS IMPRESSIVE; THE ROOMIN ROOF SYSTEMDELIVERED ON ALL FRONTS”


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


THE BENEFITS OFMODULAR There has been a push recently to increase the use of offsite fabrication and systems across the sector in a push to encourage greater efficiency and higher productivity. Systems such as structurally insulated panels (SIPs) and pre engineered insulated roof systems as the ones used at Plumb Park are becoming ever more common. Discussing the success of MMC’s (modern methods of construction) use in this project, Sherlock believes more housebuilders will need to embrace newer and faster methods of construction in the near future, “which in turn will enable them to comply with more stringent energy efficiency demands and help the UK meet its net zero targets.” Sherlock says: “The industry is beginning to rethink the way it designs,


engineers and constructs buildings, and is helping to deliver projects quicker, better, and with a greater degree of precision.” Among the benefits the approach brought to this project, he notes the sustainability credentials of offsite construction, with waste being easier to manage at the development as factory production provides a greater control of material usage. “This is compounded by the core component of this particular system being timber,” adds Sherlock, “which itself is sustainable.” Further benefits of the technology’s use


in this project included less time spent working at height and erecting scaffolding in confined spaces for site operatives, reduced vehicle movements onsite, and less manual handling during installation. In addition, the risk associated with failing blockwork from exposed gable walls was eliminated, thereby making the construction process safer.


DELIVERY With the challenging crescent now complete, and the development expected to reach completion by the end of 2022, TaylorWimpey hails the Plumb Park as a successful example of the integration of modular construction. As well as enabling the team to reduce build costs, and health and safety risks onsite, it has reportedly achieved higher thermal efficiency and build quality. Dale Saunders, technical compliance director at the housebuilder, says that it “not only helped TaylorWimpey simplify the build process,” but enabled “innovative solutions” that made the project possible. Looking forward, Saunders says that


TaylorWimpey will continue to work to review and consider how the approach can be used to surmount obstacles on schemes, “including those challenges that will be faced through the upcoming changes to be introduced through Part L of the Building Regulations.” g


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100