GROUNDWORKS 57
BREAKING BARRIERS TO SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE
In the face of escalating urban fl ooding challenges across the UK, Richard Eddy of Polypipe Building Products looks how to break down the barriers to introducing sustainable drainage systems in housebuilding projects.
W
ith the UK’s sewerage infrastructure straining under the pressures of ageing and the
intensifi ed rainfall due to climate change, the urgency for innovative and effective drainage solutions has never been greater. Put simply, Sustainable rainage Systems (SuS prevent urban fl ooding by lessening the amount of rainwater that rushes into sewers when it pours while also cleaning the water naturally, removing contaminants. They do this by using natural methods to deal with rainfall, holding onto the water and letting it soak into the earth or releasing it gradually instead of just funnelling rainwater into sewers and rivers like traditional drainage does. This method not only eases the burden on our sewer infrastructure but also helps to boost city greenery and wildlife by integrating features like green roofs, rain gardens and porous paths. These elements not only have aesthetic and environmental benefi ts, but also help to cool cities down, offsetting the heat island effect where built-up areas are signifi cantly warmer than their surroundings.
ll of this means that SuS could not only play a critical role in managing urban fl ood risks, but in ensuring that water is handled in a way that benefi ts the environment too.
OVERCOMING BARRIERS
espite the fact that SuS has been available for decades and is a proven approach to mitigating fl ood risks by managing rainwater at its source their adoption within new build developments has been surprisingly slow. This is despite the fact that Ofwat’s Code for Adoption guidance, which was introduced in 2021, was aimed specifi cally to bolster
the uptake of SuS in new construction projects. This raises questions around the barriers to widespread adoption. One signifi cant barrier to broader SuS implementation lies in the housebuilding communitys apprehension, and knowledge gap. isgivings range from concerns over the complexity of SuS installation, to a lack of defi nitive clarity surrounding the defi nition and requirements of their integration into projects. Such hurdles are further compounded by a notable gap in the availability of information and resources aimed at explaining SuS for builders and developers.
The forthcoming enforcement of Schedule 3 of the Flood and ater anagement ct 2010 in ngland, which mandates the incorporation of SuS in all new residential developments larger than
100 m2
, represents a watershed moment. This legislative shift, already in effect in ales since 201, signals an urgent need for the housebuilding sector to adapt swiftly. et, the introduction of this mandate also highlights the importance of recognising the unique characteristics of each development site to ensure the successful implementation of SuS. Tailoring sustainable drainage solutions to specifi c site conditions taking into account factors like soil type, topography and the existing infrastructure is essential for maximising their effectiveness. The early integration of SuS planning and design stages into development projects not only facilitates compliance but also enhances the long-term resilience and sustainability of urban areas against increasing fl ooding risks.
ONE SIGNIFICANT BARRIER TO BROADER SUDS IMPLEMENTATION LIES IN THE HOUSEBUILDING COMMUNITY’S APPREHENSION AND KNOWLEDGE GAP
WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76