search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
8 COMMENT Katy Davis


Why new towns must not eclipse town centre regeneration


Katy Davis at Carter Jonas explains why the next decade of delivery depends on places we already have.


T


INCREASING TOWN CENTRE HOUSING IS NOT SIMPLY A RESPONSE TO TARGETS


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


he renewed interest in new towns shows that the Government has recognised the value of planning as a driver of economic growth. Large scale settlements will be important in shaping long term spatial strategy and meeting housing needs.


But if we allow the political focus on new towns to dominate the agenda, we risk neglecting the places that can deliver most quickly, including our existing town centres. While Ministers talk in terms of decades, many high street schemes could be delivered within a single plan period. Hounslow’s town centre regeneration, for example, moved from consent to completion in under 10 years.


In my view we do not have the luxury of choosing between new towns or town centres.


NEW TOWNS ARE AMBITIOUS BUT SLOW New settlements require strategic land assembly, new utilities, new transport links and often new governance structures. They can unlock long term growth but they are complicated, capital intensive and sensitive to changes in policy and markets. They rely on stable funding and political momentum over years, which is rarely guaranteed. Town centres, by contrast, have much of the infrastructure already in place. Many sites sit within strong public transport networks and benefi t from political support for change Revisions to the NPPF to introduce a default “yes” for homes around railway stations reinforce the potential of sustainable urban locations and should strengthen the case for centrally located housing.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68