search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
4 INDUSTRY NEWS


FROM THE EDITOR


James Parker


London might be one of the hardest places to build new homes in the country, as shown in a new report, but it is not down to public opposition, rather planning delays. “Uncertainty” is the other key reason blamed for lack of delivery, despite “clear and active public support for new housing,” particularly recorded among Londoners under 45 years old.


The report was published by a group which exists to foster collaboration between stakeholders to get sites underway, Just Build Homes, who collated over 3,600 comments which it submitted in favour of residential planning applications. These comments, say the body, have led to approval for just under 14,000 new homes across the capital.


The Mayor of London’s consulted on speeding up housing delivery, in a process which ended in January, and the report, titled ‘Get London Building Again’ is Just Build Homes’s response,


ON THE COVER


HOUSEBUILDER & DEVELOPER


FEBRUARY/MARCH 2026


The evidence shows that “support for new homes comes from every part of London, across all age groups and boroughs,” said the organisation. The reasons given included bringing down the price of homes, tackling the housing shortage, reducing overcrowding and addressing homelessness. However, over 60% of those backing new home construction were under 45, and three in four were non-homeowners.


Londoners backed “a wide range of schemes, including town centre redevelopments, brownfi eld regeneration, uild to ent, estate regeneration and higher-density housing in well-connected locations.”


he fi ndings were in star contrast to a recent sharp slowdown in delivery.” London is believed to need around 88,000 new homes built each year, yet starts and completions have fallen signifi cantly, with most boroughs failing to meet their London Plan targets. Fewer than 10,000 homes were completed in the year to March 2024, according to Knight Frank, the lowest annual total for nearly a decade.


Update your registration here: AN MMC COMMUNITY


Untold Living’s 77-unit MMC scheme in Shropshire reshapes what retirement living developments look like, promoting independence


HBD_0203_2026 Covers.indd 1


© Untold Living Go to page 28


19/02/2026 10:23


In its report, Just Build Homes sets out a 10-point policy plan aimed at restoring confi dence in ondon’s housing pipeline hey focus on “reducing planning risk, accelerating decision-making, unlocking stalled land and widening participation in housing delivery.”


While welcoming the London Mayor’s “ambition to speed up housing delivery,” Just Build Homes’ Millie Dod said: “This report provides clear evidence that Londoners are ready for bold action. London’s housing crisis is visible in rising rents, growing waiting lists, overcrowded homes and increasing homelessness. Thousands of residents from across the capital are actively supporting new housing.”


She added: “The challenge is to match public support for new homes with decisive leadership. By embracing the reforms set out in this response, the ayor has an opportunity to unloc delivery, rebuild confi dence in the planning system and ‘Get London Building Again’.”


Looking to update or cancel your registration? Scan the QR code to visit our registration page. From here you can also register for our Digital Issues and Newsletters. Alternatively, please visit hbdonline.co.uk/subscribe


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


With so many other challenges in the capital, from the extortionate price of many sites, high demolition costs and contaminated brownfi elds, plus a stagnant housing market, it’s unsurprising that more and more housebuilders and developers are turning to retrofi t as a far more viable proposition. We heard from housebuilders and organisations including the  at our recent retrofi t round table that this other, admittedly more sustainable option, is also riven with further questions, particularly on at-scale delivery in the private sector.


James Parker


Managing Editor James Parker


Publisher Anthony Parker


Account Director Midge Myatt


Account Manager Steve Smith


Digital Marketing & PR Account Manager Suzanne Easter


Operations Director Shelley Collyer


Editorial Contributor Roseanne Field


Event Coordinator Amy Madigan


Studio Manager Mikey Pooley


Production Assistant Georgia Musson


Digital Production Coordinator Kimberley Musson


Feature Coordinator & Publisher’s Assistant Kim Neville


Finance Director Simon Reed


An Employee Owned Company


Cointronic House, Station Road, Heathfi eld, East Sussex TN21 8DF


Advertising & Administration 01435 863500 info@netmagmedia.co.uk


Press Releases editorial@netmagmedia.co.uk


Registration & Circulation Enquiries info@netmagmedia.co.uk


In association with:


T e manufacturer of the paper used within our publication is a Chain-of-Custody certifi ed supplier operating within environmental systems certifi ed to both ISO 14001 and EMAS in order to ensure sustainable production.


Subscription costs just £24 for 6 issues, including post and packing. Phone 01435 863500 for details. Individual copies of the publication are available at £5 each inc p & p.


All rights reserved.


No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, including photocopying, recording or stored in any information retrieval system without the express prior written consent of the publisher. Although every eff ort is made to ensure the accuracy and reliability of material published in Housebuilder & Developer, the publisher can accept no responsibility for the claims or opinions made by contributors, manufacturers or advertisers. Editorial contributors to this journal may have made a payment towards the reproduction costs of material used to illustrate their products.


Printed in England.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68