26 COMMENT
Its primary purpose is to help create beautiful, successful and enduring places that foster a sense of community, local pride and belonging. It has been tasked with helping draw up design codes for different areas that could speed up the planning process for millions of new homes by providing a fast track if builders stay in line with the codes.
Boys Smith has already been given the
THERE ARE GLIMMERS THAT THE ANTI-DEVELOPMENT MOOD WITHIN GOVERNMENT MIGHT BE ABOUT TO CHANGE
provide people with ready access to the countryside and recreational activities.
RIPE FOR DEVELOPMENT, OR PRESERVED FOREVER?
In England there are 14 areas of Green Belt, which accounts for approximately 13% of the total land area. It amounts to 1.6 million hectares (almost a third of this is around the capital), and it does indeed provide valuable protections for farmland, forestry and nature reserves.
But it also includes a lot of unattractive scrub, brownfi eld sites (such as redundant farm buildings), and low grade agricultural land, as well as quarries and disused farms.
Is it right that such a valuable resource should be preserved in aspic and never considered for any housing development, even where there is local support for this? Meanwhile there is limited appetite for the building of new towns (despite some support from Labour leader Keir Starmer), the modular building sector has suffered a series of existential setbacks and the conversion of former offi ce buildings and retail sites is also proving to be problematic, not least because of the enormous cost of retrofi tting them and providing them with modern facilities and infrastructure.
But we also have brownfi eld sites all across England that have been identifi ed for redevelopment and which collectively could provide suffi cient land for 1.2 million homes (about half of this already has planning permission) and which are largely lying dormant.
The countryside charity CPRE has analysed hundreds of brownfi eld land registers, looking at urban sites that have
WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK
previously been built on. The amount of land available for new housing covered 27,342 hectares, which represents just 1.7% of the combined Green Belt land.
A BALANCED APPROACH
Surely the answer to our housing crisis lies in taking a balanced approach – to undertake both widespread development of brownfi eld sites, and complement this with limited development of the Green Belt. Developers could be offered incentives to invest in brownfi eld sites, which often needs a lot of expensive cleaning up and remediation work, while local housing needs should prevail over NIMBYism in the countryside.
A strong case exists for including Green Belts in the list of possible solutions to the housing crisis. Without this we are condemning hundreds of thousands or people, maybe even millions of our fellow residents, to lives without hope of ever attaining a secure and affordable home. When the possibility of re-examining our approach to Green Belts is mentioned as part of a solution to our broken housing market, it is usually met with howls of indignation and accusations that a wicked minority of townies want to ‘concrete over’ the countryside. Indeed threats of rebellion among Conservative backbench Ms have been suffi cient to cover several Prime Ministers and Secretaries of State from taking action. However, there are glimmers that this anti-development mood within Government might be about to change following the appointment of Nicholas Boys Smith to run the Offi ce for lace, within the Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities.
unoffi cial title of building design tsar. Earlier in the New Year he gave media interviews in which he said that not all of the Green Belt – i.e. that “of low or no agricultural or amenity quality” – should be protected for ever.”
BEAUTIFUL HOMES
Boys Smith is not advocating mass development, but instead a change of approach. “We have not built enough over the last fi ve, 10, 15, 20 or 30 years. As a society, we have fallen out of love with the future and we have under both political parties failed to build enough homes.” “Clearly we need to look at the quality of land within Green Belts and need to think about which of these should be preserved.” By implication, he is suggesting that lower quality land can and should be released for development. Boys Smith also said he opposes more volume housebuilding that involves chucking a culdesac in a fi eld. He wants planning and design codes drafted with community and council involvement so the public can require what they fi nd beautiful and refuse what they fi nd ugly. He may well receive valuable support from the Local Government Association, whose housing spokesperson, Councillor Darren Rodwell, said “People want their local area to have high-quality affordable homes built in the right places, supported by the right infrastructure, and councils stand ready to help the Government to tackle local housing challenges.” The LGA’s position is that to help increase the speed of local plan-making and housing delivery, the Government should bring forward consultations on a revised National Planning Policy Framework and National Development Management Policies which will form the backbone of a new style of plan-making due in Autumn 2024.
All of which gives me some confi dence that we could be moving towards a consensus which is capable of delivering much more housing, of a higher quality and built in a wider variety of spaces, with far greater public involvement in its design and location. This would be a notable achievement, but there is no time to lose and our politicians need to be open to adopting new policies which in the past they would have rejected.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76
