search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
20 THE CLIMATE CHALLENGE


The real-world ramifications of putting building fabric first


HOUSEBUILDERS ARE UNDER INCREASING PRESSURE TO CONSIDER THE LONG TERM ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF ALL BUILDINGS FROM THE EARLIEST STAGE OF THE DESIGN PROCESS – CIARAN MCALISKEY, KEYSTONE LINTELS


Ciaran McAliskey of Keystone Lintels argues the case for taking a fabric first approach to meeting the Future Homes Standard, in order to set housebuilders on the best path to hitting net zero carbon.


F


aced with the UK’s ambitious commitment to bring carbon emissions to net zero by 2050 and the resulting stricter Building Regulations, housebuilders are under increasing pressure to consider the long term energy efficiency of all buildings from the earliest stage of the design process. From 2025, all new housing will be expected to produce much lower carbon emissions compared to current standards under the Future Homes Standard, and will therefore require low carbon heating technologies. To meet these targets, taking a fabric first approach within A will be essential to comply with the new art  regulations, and is a critical first step to reaching the


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


performance levels required to future- proof UK homes.


The Government is committed to bringing in the Future Homes Standard (FHS) in 2025, which will see a new build house have 75% lower CO2


emissions


than one built to today’s standards. This will be achieved by having very high standards of energy efficiency and low carbon heating (i.e. heat pumps). The art  updates that came into force on 15 June 2022 are an important stepping stone to the FHS and will mean carbon emissions from new homes will need to be 31% lower than at present. To put things into context, the previous art  uplift in 2013 was 6%. Therefore, this interim 31% uplift will require some fairly significant


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68