search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
16 COMMENT


new homes will be required annually in the North and Midlands.


HELPWITH LEVELLING UP The Building Back Britain Commission – an independent group comprising of business leaders from Barratt Developments, Legal & General, Mace, NHBC, The Riverside Group and Thakeham – has published a report which highlights how the Government’s plans to level up the country will lead to a significant increase in demand for housing outside London and the south east, as well as reducing pressure on areas with a current high demand, such as the Home Counties. The Commission’s research assumes


that over the next two decades employ- ment levels will increase in areas the Government has identified as being most in need of levelling up, and which currently have rates below the national average. The jobs boost which will result from plans to boost regional growth, will lead to increased demand for housing (of different tenure types) for people who are already living in these areas, as well as those who will move to these towns and


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


cities in search of new jobs. The Commission’s key findings include:


• Over the next 20 years around 86,000 to 140,000 homes will be needed every year in the areas defined as most in need of levelling up – a third of this will be ‘affordable housing’;


• This is around an additional 13,000 to 67,000 homes every year compared to the Government’s current estimates for those areas; •Birmingham would require the largest increase in new homes. Currently, 4,829 homes a year have been earmarked under the standard way the Government assesses need. This would rise to 12,430 homes a year under a scenario based on future growth; and


• Manchester requires the second largest increase in new homes. Using the present housing assessment, 3,527 homes are needed a year. This more than doubles to 7,469 homes a year based on future growth. The Building Back Britain Commission


used the report to set out a Housing Strategy which includes a radical rethink in the way that housing demand is


calculated to a model which shifts from being based on historical growth to a new ‘levelling up’ model of future need. Their report also argues for the creation of at least one ‘Construction Cluster’ in every region of the UK by 2030 to foster innovation and help train up workers in the latest methods of construction, with the first of these located in Leeds. They also want to see at least 75,000 high quality MMC homes built a year by 2030. Terrie Alafat, who chairs the Building


Back Britain Commission, said: “Our results have profound implications for policy. The Government’s current housing strategy simply does not fit the levelling up agenda. It is based on past growth trends and will not be dynamic enough to meet future demand. The increase in demand in levelling up areas should reduce the pressure for new homes in other areas that are already economically developed.” We should hear shortly from Michael


Gove on which direction he is likely to take. I suspect the Building Back Britain Commission may have more reason to celebrate than members of the LGA.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68