20 COMMENT
more than this will be required if a quick step-change is to be delivered to the supply side. Remember it was only a few months ago that the National Housing Federation and Shelter teamed up to submit a growth plan which it was claimed could deliver about 90,000 social (or affordable) homes a year and which more than pays for itself in just three years by providing a massive boost to the rest of the economy and in particular the construction sector.
The NHF/Shelter plan showed that within just three years, the 90,000 new social rent homes will have paid for themselves and returned £37.8bn back into the economy, largely by boosting construction. It would directly support nearly 140,000 jobs in the fi rst year alone. In addition, the plan showed that new social homes have the potential to generate huge savings for the taxpayer across multiple government departments, as follows: • 4.bn savings on housing benefi t • £2.5bn income from construction taxes
• £3.8bn income from employment taxes
• .2bn savings to the HS • £4.5bn savings from reduction in homelessness and
• £3.3bn savings to Universal Credit. SCALING UP
The total economic and social benefi ts of building 90,000 social rent homes could generate £51.2bn net over 30 years (that’s .bn gross), including a 12bn profi t to the taxpayer. But can this be scaled up to deliver maybe 120,000 or 150,000 social rent homes a year – and do the scale of benefi ts still apply What about the possibility of including or adding affordable rent and shared ownership homes to the model?
Speaking at the report’s launch earlier this year Polly Neate, chief executive of Shelter, commented: “Homelessness is a political choice…investment is the best way to improve productivity. If we invest in building 90,000 social homes a year, we could end
homelessness, save the taxpayer money, boost jobs, reduce
the burden of poor housing on our NHS and improve children’s life chances.” eate added If this Government or the next is serious about wanting the economy to grow and people to thrive, investing in genuinely affordable housing is a no brainer. Building 90,000 social homes would pay for themselves and return an impressive £37.8bn back to the economy in just three years.”
WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK
Francis said a lack of skilled construction labour and product manufacturing capacity may defeat the homebuilding plan. “As housebuilding recovers over the next few years, these may emerge as the key constraints given that a signifi cant rise in UK skilled labour and product manufacturing requires upfront investment (time and money) for a long-term return.”
WHEN IT’S PUT LIKE THAT, WHAT’S NOT TO LIKE?
Assuming this plan or a version of it is adopted by Labour, there is still the matter of how the other 200,000 new homes a year are to be delivered.
The Government has already signalled its willingness to build on the ‘grey belt’ – those parts of the green belt which are not really beautiful and have previously been used for car parks, petrol stations, retail or industrial parks and disused farm buildings. And then there is the huge untapped potential of Britain’s Brownfi eld sites which collectively could provide space for over one million new homes.
COLLECTIVE SUPPORT
The private housebuilders have warmly welcomed Labour’s plans and intentions, with their bosses lining up to voice their support after meeting the new Housing Secretary and Deputy Prime Minister Angela Rayner.
Neil Jefferson, chief executive of the Home Builders Federation, said: “Planning has been the biggest constraint on housebuilding in recent years and the measures proposed will address the main areas of concern by bringing more land forward for development more quickly.” But the builders still need to deliver the new homes and Ministers will be keen to ensure there are no fresh instances of land banking for the future, in order to maximise profi ts and shareholder dividends.
A cautionary note has been struck by Construction Products Association director, Noble Francis, who warned “there just won’t be the people” to meet the housebuilding pledge.
Francis said the UK’s housebuilding workforce and product manufacturing capacity have fallen in recent years, so “new investment in skills and capacity will initially be needed just to get them back to where they were two to three years ago. Francis pointed to fi gures showing there were 2.08 million people employed in construction in the fi rst quarter of 2024, down 1.9% year-on-year. This could of course be tackled by targeted recruitment from mainland Europe, where there is a huge pool of skilled construction workers. Remember the time a few years back when we relied very heavily on workers from Poland and other parts of Eastern Europe to provide a wide number of building services. The other potential blockage (which might be more diffi cult to solve) is that the main providers of new social housing (local authorities and housing associations) are already facing enormous pressures currently – primarily to upgrade their existing housing stock - so it is energy effi cient, free from water leaks and mould – while also dealing with new consumer standards. However, Kate Henderson, chief executive at the National Housing Federation, did not think this was an insurmountable problem for her members. Overall she said the King’s Speech outlined some “important and welcome fi rst steps towards tackling the housing crisis and increasing the delivery of desperately needed affordable and social homes.”
Henderson added that the NHF looks forward “to working closely with the Government to ensure that a revitalised planning system delivers the number and types of affordable homes the country needs. However, “this will not be possible through planning reform alone and will need to be met with the right funding.”
“Housing associations stand ready to support the Government on this to deliver the biggest increase in social and affordable housebuilding in a generation.” With this amount of collective agreement and support the prospects for delivering serious growth in housebuilding have never looked better since the late 1970s – all of which is making so many housing professionals optimistic that this time the Government’s plans could work.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
