search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
32


INDUSTRY VIEWFINDER


Do you believe that third-party certification is essential for robust product specification on the following criteria? g Yes g No g Don’t Know


Were respondents experiencing clarity and transparency of information within product certifications, and which sources were best and worst on this front? The main offender was ‘company literature,’ (for 55% of respondents), followed by CPDs on 51%. Not far below were ‘direct conversations with suppliers’ at 41%, ‘editorial in trade magazines’ at 35%, and advertising at 29%. Better performing areas were ‘contact with certifying bodies’ (13%), and ‘contact with third-party testing bodies’ at 12%.


Systems & composite testing The ability of the industry to provide safety, performance and sustainability data on completed build-ups assemblies, replicating real-world specifications on projects rather than just individual products, remains a contentious area. Our results confirmed the importance of this issue for specifiers, with a lack of such testing in the UK currently. A compelling 88% of respondents said they believed ‘testing and certification of product systems should be made a requirement.” However, we asked a question around issues resulting from the incoming UKCA Mark for products, and a respondent said that what was needed was performance accreditation for ‘composite products’ in various build-ups, but this raised further constraints for specifiers. “It would be good to have a complete performance mark for composite products but as with wall specifications, if only that one build-up or material thickness is tested, then only it can be specified.”


Conclusion


Our survey tackled a wide variety of crucial and challenging product certification issues, and gained some fascinating insights and some surprises, while confirming expectations in other areas. As rigour in project accountability and data increases alongside tighter legislation, we find ourselves in a new era of much greater admin and rigour sitting on the desks of architects and manufacturers, but a resultant general improvement in credibility and trust. The ultimate aim is a transparent and accountable system which will work against the possibility of further tragedies occurring, and increase our chances of meeting sustainability aims. Major challenges remain – the proliferation of testing bodies with no national overseeing body, a lack of clarity in certifications, and a lack of product certification of the assemblies which are to be used on actual projects. Perhaps under the new Government, the Construction Products Regulator will be given the ‘teeth’ to really bring a sense of compulsion to testing effectively, and bring the threads together in order to give the clarity and confidence specifiers need. It needs to be near the top of the long to-do list.


For a full report on this survey, including data on availability of certified products, extra background on the new regime post- Building Safety Act and post-Brexit, and more insight into the data obtained including verbatim comments on the changes to EPDs, visit our ‘insights’ website insights.netmagmedia.co.uk • Thanks to our survey sponsors Lamilux, Hambleside Danelaw Building Products, Soprema and Promat.


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF SEPTEMBER 2024


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84