search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
38


“Please rate the changes in the Building Safety Act in their potential for improving the safety regime” g Excellent g Very Good g Good g Acceptable g Poor


the entirety of projects, and thereby “preserving the original design intent,” would make the taking of shortcuts on quality impossible. This data would be stored and updated beyond completion, and throughout the building’s life cycle.


Any changes to the design or specification would be subject to a formal checking process, and in theory, the final referee of the process would be the architect, in the new Principal Designer role, which was first sighted in the 2015 Construction Design and Management site safety regulations. This would restore much greater power to architects in a residential sector in which they’ve arguably been sidelined. However, do architects want such a level of power when it comes with such great responsibility, and is it practically possible, notwithstanding the profession’s wish to lead a more robust safety culture?


Levels of confusion Grenfell, along with other major fires, sadly revealed some serious shortcomings within the procurement system, one of which is characterised by multiple and confusing layers of responsibility, regulation, and accreditation. This led to the potential of the system being abused by some unscrupulous firms, or at the very least, loopholes to be legally exploited for business gains. Hackitt has been applauded by architects for targeting “fragmentation” as an endemic problem in the industry. There is an accompanying lack of clarity on roles and responsibilities,


particularly who is responsible for ensuring architects’ design specifications are upheld throughout. In design and build contracts, where design responsibility is ‘novated’ to the contractor, this becomes even more complex.


This parsing out of responsibility is also complex on the client side, such as in local authorities or tenant management organisations, as it was in the case of Grenfell. Projects can be long- running, and continuity of professionals involved through the life of a design can be rare, with new teams emerging at the end, taking over from others. Hackitt has at the very least, fully shed light on the issue.


One of the main problems for architects, due to the lack of clear roles and accountability – and profit motives being allowed to drive the agenda as a result – is that their design role can be sidelined. Subcontractors may be given key roles overseeing design decisions, and architects may not be given sight of detailed costings.


Acting on the issues The six-part Building Safety Act introduced the new changes when it comes to accountability in projects, including the Dutyholder role within projects, and following their completion. Part 2 of the act includes provisions to introduce a new National Building Safety Regulator (BSR), within an overall new safety framework, including the Golden Thread. The BSR, which will sit within the Health and Safety Executive, will “oversee safety and standards of all buildings,” but will only


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


ADF SEPTEMBER 2022


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100