INSULATION 79
A global y-value can also be calculated, representing the percentage of overall heat losses from a building associated with thermal bridging.
What’s new in the regulations? The updates to Part L of the Building Regulations in England and Wales, and Section 6 (Energy) of the Building Standards in Scotland implement a number of key updates designed to raise practice around junctions and thermal bridges. In the design phase, these changes encourage the use of details and associated psi-values where possible.
As under the previous regulations, when modelling a property within SAP or SBEM, energy assessors still have the option to use a default psi-value for a junction where no detail is provided. However, this default value has been notably worsened. Similarly, where a default global y-value is available, this has also been worsened. This means that other areas of the specification may have to be significantly improved to reach compliance when using these values. The use of PV and WWHR is also essential to meet the carbon emissions and primary energy targets. This means using the default psi-values or the new global y-value may significantly increase the cost of reaching compliance.
It is also important to note that the Accredited Construction Details (ACDs) have now been removed in England and Wales. These were first developed back in 2002 and provided standard details and psi-values for a range of common constructions. However, it was felt these had become outdated and were no longer fit for purpose, as the details modelled were for less well insulated constructions. Scotland has a separate set of ACDs with modelled psi-values for each junction, which are more up-to-date and have been retained.
Reaching compliance There is a raft of manufacturer-created and industry-created details and guidance now available, reflecting actual build-ups and performance, complete with associated psi-values. These include reputable non-government databases containing independently assessed thermal junction details. In practice, however, these will not cover every scenario so it may be necessary to produce bespoke details with calculated
ADF NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2023
psi-values. When developing these, it is important that all junction details are reflective of real constructions, with good thermal performance to minimise losses, but that also represent good practices and are buildable on site. It’s also worth noting that the use of bespoke or industry-created details may help to reinforce specifications in England and Wales. This is due to the new requirement for project teams to submit design stage and as-built compliance reports. These reports include the energy modelling carried out in SAP/SBEM and require any changes from the original specification used in the design stage report to be clearly detailed.
As factors such as the insulation product’s thermal conductivity are incorporated into psi-value calculations, this can prevent insulation products being substituted with lower performing alternatives.
An eye for details
Closing the performance gap is a key priority for everyone within the construction industry. By utilising bespoke or industry-generated details and associated psi-values, it should be possible to limit heat losses at building junctions. This can help to support a best practice fabric-first approach, allowing properties to use heat efficiently and therefore limiting both their operational carbon demand and heating costs.
Jonathan Ducker is head of regulatory affairs at Kingspan Insulation GB
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
By utilising bespoke or industry-generated details and associated psi-values, it should be possible to limit heat losses at building junctions
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84
