search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
36


PROJECT REPORT: COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS


MASSIVE IMPRESSIVE


The interiors make full aesthetic use of the massive retained internal concrete columns, and other raw concrete elements of the structure


“We wanted to ensure the building could meet wide parameters, addressing the human factor of what people actually want from a space.” As part of this, a key tenet of the proposed design was the desire not just to renew the structure, but to “celebrate” its prominence in the community. Foster says this meant “not covering any of it up.”


Helping enable the retention of the existing “amazing” structure of the building, as well as adding the four stories above, the team was pleased to find that the original concrete frame “was still in good condition.” “That’s one of the great things about retrofit – if the structure is strong, you immediately start with a sense of character that would be very hard to recreate.” One notable retention was the circulation towers in The Dock, which the architect explains have become “something of a landmark” along the canal since they were


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


constructed, bringing further character to the scheme.


Both towers are designed to seamlessly rise to the height of the extended building, each now topped by a glass ‘feature’ room for use as an office meeting space. “The team were able to design the open office spaces inside this skeleton,” says Foster, “saving time and money, and reducing the environmental impact of the project.” On the exterior of The Dock, facade design was informed through parametric analysis of thermal comfort, carbon emissions and daylight access. The south facade was modelled with and without adjacent tall properties, and windows and external shading design were sized to allow removal of external shading when adjacent property overshadows the property in the future. Additionally, the choice of timber material allowed the team to build more


ADF NOVEMBER/DECEMBER 2023


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84