search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
PROJECT REPORT: HOTELS, RESTAURANTS & BARS 37


transferring the load from the roof to the ground, and tying the roof sections down. Architect Teresa Erskine says the structural engineer was “delighted with the V-shape,” as they enabled the creation of a bespoke column due to its structural benefits. She adds: “It was great to settle on a result where the form equaled the function.” Rather than add rainwater pipes, dark circular structural columns function as rainwater pipes – transferring the rainwater from the roof to below the decking. Another neat solution is how the facade uplighting has been included at the bottom of the otherwise frameless glass balustrade; other lighting and mechanical and electrical systems are exposed yet concealed within or behind the secondary decorative steel elements. The automated lighting (specified by Light Bureau) bestows the V-shaped columns a warm yellow hue, making them more of an attraction at street level. The datum line of the balustrade’s base aligns


ADF MAY 2024


with top of the existing wall, “giving the illusion that the terrace is floating above the structure,” says Teresa Erskine, enhancing the lightness which is inherent to the structural design.


The unusually shaped site was both “long and tight,” says Erskine, so the bar space needed to integrate the services and spaces as much as possible to maximise floor area. But despite dealing with a range of structural challenges and the constraints of the site itself, the result has not compromised the aesthetic goals of a light structure.


Structural challenges


The systematic approach to designing a building ‘inside out’ has led to “intelligent solutions that have evolved out from the site constraints,” commented the architects. The “biggest constraint,” says Teresa Erskine, was the level change across the historic site, exacerbated by the 1990


WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


OPEN


The unusually-shaped curved footprint led to a series of interesting subdivided spaces, narrowing towards the central open ‘pergola’ section


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84