10 COMMENT
Intricate detailing, patterns and textures can be achieved using a ‘hybrid’ method combining offsite tech and onsite installation
about 20 years ago with blockwork infill walling. The lasting legacy of our failed offsite enterprise was a successful SFS (Steel Framing Systems) business. SFS initially struggled to gain traction for the infilling of frame bays. It was faster and tidier, but there was no shortage of blockwork installers and Building Control inspectors were unfamiliar with it, demanding calculation packs for every job. They stopped doing that over time and as the popularity grew, there were fewer blockwork installers available, and very quickly SFS became the standard method. In about five years there was a complete turnaround, and it will never go back to the way things were.
The same thing looks set to happen with brickwork. If people see the emergence of quality brick slip systems, why would they spend their apprenticeship training for what might be a dying art? We began developing our brick slip system about five years ago. As a super-critical person myself, I didn’t want anything that could be accused of being ‘fake’; I wanted a modern interpretation of the use of clay as a robust, durable cladding material. When developing all our systems, we always have offsite compatibility in mind. sWe have firm ideas about what a successful offsite construction company should do, and I think you can predict those who will fail.
For example, our envelope business has shown us that it’s not necessary to standardise the componentry. When a building is surveyed, what looks like 500 identical cladding panels can often end up being 500 unique panels with just a few millimetres of variation. The key is to have a process that can cater for this – usually a digital order-processing and manufacturing environment. Each one of our cladding systems has up to 100 pages of internal design guide documentation associated with it, covering such things as span capabilities, connection locations, stiffener locations etc.
WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK
Furthermore, I firmly believe that the final finish should be applied onsite. This deserves an article in its own right, but in summary, it allows you to disguise the fact that the building is modular – it saves space, and gets the module out of the factory quicker and it allows for a degree of refinement of the aesthetic not possible in the factory. It also allows larger modules to be transported and reduces pressure on potentially performance- damaging efforts to make the external wall slender. You also don’t have to retain the envelope installers on your payroll.
Aces in their places Finally, I think many companies would benefit from working in partnership with specialists in two key areas – the load-bearing frame, and the building envelope. If you buy an off-the-shelf load- bearing frame, in 10 years that’s what you’ll still have. By contrast, partnering with a company that does this as a core business puts you at the forefront of product and process technology. For building envelopes, the case is even more convincing. External walls are extremely complex and subject now to more regulatory requirements than ever, possibly including a 15-year statutory defect period. Cladding systems fail much more frequently than people think, and they’re very expensive to rectify. Designing a ventilated system without cold bridges that doesn’t result in long term moisture problems is not straightforward. Materials and finishes are changing all the time. Economies of scale mean that envelope specialists can offer you state-of-the-art solutions at reasonable costs. The envelope is what everybody sees when the job is finished and it defines the quality perception of the project, so it’s important to investigate the best solutions.
Dr Jonathan Evans is CEO at Ash & Lacy ADF NOVEMBER 2021
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28
