Industry News


Fixing dangerous and unfit homes would save more than £1.5 billion in annual health and social care savings


F


ixing England’s most dangerous homes lived in by older people would directly save the NHS and the social care sector more


than £1.5 billion a year, while delivering billions more in health benefits, newly published research has revealed. Removing the most serious risks to people’s


health and safety from the country’s poorest quality homes where the head of household is 55 or over would result in savings to the NHS of nearly £600 million per year, according to new research from the Centre for Ageing Better. And formal care costs for older people provided


by professional caregivers could be reduced by £1.1 billion a year by 2027 by resolving poor quality home issues, according to analysis by academics at the Care Policy and Evaluation Centre (CPEC), based at the London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE). In addition, the LSE analysis indicates the


potential for a further £3.5 billion annual savings in unpaid care costs for older people provided by family members, neighbours, or friends if the nation’s poor-quality housing crisis was resolved. Previous research from the Centre for Ageing


Better identified £19 billion of annual health benefits from investing more in home improvement. Te new research was presented at a special event on the cost of poor-quality housing to health and social care held at the LSE in late May. Dr Carole Easton OBE, chief executive at


the Centre for Ageing Better, said: “Tere is a terrible personal cost for older people who live in homes that are making them ill and which have the potential to seriously injure and even kill them. Older people are more likely to live in a dangerous, damp or cold home and are among the most vulnerable to the health impacts which can exacerbate conditions such as asthma and arthritis, as well as increasing the risk of an acute episode such as a stroke or heart attack.”


HOUSING AND HEALTH LINK “But this country’s poor-quality housing crisis also


reaps a terrible cost on our already stretched health and social care sectors. Fixing unsafe homes is a value-for-money solution that will not only help people to live healthier and longer lives, but will also reduce pressures on health and social care.” “With so much supporting evidence pointing


to significant benefits, it beggars belief that home improvement is not higher up the political agenda. Improving the country’s health cannot be done without improving the quality of our homes.”


Even just removing three common health hazards from homes of bad condensation, excess cold, and rising damp would lower the social care costs considerably


While people aged 55 and over live in around


one in three of England’s non-decent homes, they account for more than half of the NHS’s annual first year treatment costs (£595 million) for injuries or illness as a result of poor-quality housing, according to analysis conducted by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) for the Centre for Ageing Better. Te scale of the health savings from home


improvement means that the estimated £4.6 billion bill to repair all Category 1 hazards that pose a threat of death or serious injury in older people’s homes would be paid back in just under eight years, the new analysis reveals. Focusing investment just on mitigating excess


cold, which claims the lives of up to 9,000 people a year in England and Wales, in every home in the country headed by an older person would deliver an estimated £325 million worth of savings to the NHS every year and pay back the repair costs within nine years. Te Centre for Ageing Better recently launched


the Safe Homes Now campaign with eight other charities including Barnardo’s, Asthma + Lung and St John Ambulance. Te campaign is calling for a national strategy to


6 | HMMJune/July 2024 | www.housingmmonline.co.uk


tackle the poor quality of the country’s homes and has challenged the government to halve the number of non-decent homes, which currently totals 3.7 million, within the next 10 years. Te Centre for Ageing Better believes that the


solution to resolving the national crisis of dangerous homes is the establishment of a national network of local one-stop shops called Good Home Hubs offering advice on home repairs, adaptations and energy efficiency improvements. Dr Nicola Brimblecombe, senior researcher at


the Care Policy and Evaluation Centre and lead of the LSE research project (CAPE), said: “Our study clearly shows how poor quality and unsuitable housing can increase people’s care needs and their ability to live independently, negatively affect wellbeing, and reduce choice.”


LONG TERM EFFECTS “Improving housing has the potential to improve


people’s quality of life, reduce health and care inequalities, and save money for government as well as having wider benefits to the environment and society. Negative effects of poor housing for social care can be long-term - action to improve poor quality housing cannot come soon enough.” Te LSE analysis indicates that the substantial


savings in formal care costs for older people by removing health hazards from homes would grow significantly over time – from £1.1 billion a year in 2027 to £2.8 billion a year by 2042. Similarly the cost savings in the level of unpaid care required would mushroom from £3.5 billion a year in 2027 to £7.1 billion a year by 2042. Even just removing three common health


hazards from homes of bad condensation, excess cold, and rising damp would lower the social care costs considerably. Te LSE analysis calculated the cost savings in


formal care would grow from £0.4 billion in 2027 to £1 billion by 2042, and the cost savings in the level of unpaid care required would grow from £1.2 billion in 2027 to £2.3 billion by 2042. Te LSE research also found that people living


in poor housing develop care needs 8 years earlier than people living in a home without any housing problems. Researchers say this earlier development of and longer time with care needs is potentially avoidable if housing was to be improved. Te academics also point out the effects of


poor housing are not experienced equally, with housing tenure, financial resources, and access to information all playing a role in development of care needs and in extent of unmet need for support.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44