Industry News
Developers told to stump up for building safety measures, but uncertainty remains over responsibility for landlords’ costs
M
ichael Gove broke the stalemate over who has responsibility for cladding removal costs by demanding that
developers pay up, but his solution may only provide a partial relief for individual leaseholders. Developers have been given until early March
to agree how they will fund the estimated £4billion cost of removing cladding from medium-rise flatted blocks (between 11m and 18m in height). Gove said he wants to publish a fully funded plan of action at this stage and he is prepared to enforce a solution, if a deal is not agreed by that date. A similar demand for financial contributions
has been made of cladding and insulation manufacturers. Gove has also asked that they provide comprehensive information on all buildings over 11m which have historic fire-safety defects to which the companies have supplied products or services. Te motivation for the Secretary of State for
Levelling Up, Housing and Communities, is to spare individual leaseholders, including shared owners, from having to shoulder the cost of removing unsafe combustible cladding from their homes. Tis follows the Government funded remediation programme for making high-rise blocks safe across the social and private sectors. But his initial announcement and subsequent
communications have not clarified responsibility for other costly and essential building safety works, such as replacing faulty insulation and fire doors, installing fire alarms and water sprinkler systems. So it is possible that leaseholders will still face some heſty bills. Developers have also pushed back saying that responsibility for the remediation work should
be shared with manufacturers and the Government. Although social landlords are not expected to
contribute to the £4bn funding pot, they have not been given access to any other Government backed loans or grants to complete cladding removal or other safety works to medium and low-rise flatted blocks they own and manage. Instead Gove has encouraged councils and
housing associations to recover remediation costs from responsible parties (presumably developers and builders) where possible, and absorb any costs that they themselves are responsible for.
FURTHER CLARIFICATION REQUIRED Similarly there is uncertainty over the position of landlords who own individual leasehold flats in medium rise blocks and rent them out. Buy to let flats will exist in both the social and private sectors. Te NRLA has written to Mr Gove highlighting that at least half of their landlord members are basic rate taxpayers and own a single rental, which they let out to boost their pensions. Te NHF and LGA are working with the
Government to clarify how non-cladding related works will be paid for, as well as details of how housing associations can access the £4bn funding. Gove has acknowledged housing associations’
unique social purpose and the impact that building safety costs have on the sector’s wider work, and has offered to work closely with the sector to mitigate this impact. Te Secretary of State also set out a strong
commitment to increasing the supply of social housing and improving the quality of existing homes – and offered to work closely with the social
housing sector to achieve this. Other steps taken by the Government include:
• Withdrawal of the consolidated advice note on building safety and its replacement with a new Publicly Available Specification (PAS 9980), which contains risk-based guidance for assessing external wall systems;
• Commencement of the Fire Safety Act will extend fire safety responsibilities to cover all external walls and common parts, including doors to individual flats, in any multi-occupied building regardless of height;
• A new scheme will be brought forward to provide professional indemnity insurance for building assessors, to help increase capacity in this field;
• Buildings between 11m and 18m in height will be considered safe unless there is evidence to the contrary. Building owners are encouraged to challenge judgements from building assessors that they believe may be excessively risk averse; and
• Te Building Safety Fund will be reviewed to ensure it is in line with the Government’s expectations of a risk-driven approach to remedial works, and information on the progress of applications to the funds will be made available to residents.
As an incentive to react positively to his
demands, Gove has warned developers, manufacturers and installers that any of them who fail to contribute to the remediation fund face being frozen out of future publicly funded contracts, or even being banned from trading in the UK.
Poor social housing has been a problem for decades
Poor social housing conditions have been a problem for 30 or 40 years and the Government, together with social landlords, face an uphill battle to solve the issue according to the Archbishop of Canterbury. During an interview with ITV News, the
Archbishop said the poor housing conditions faced by some social housing tenants (and highlighted for much of the previous year by the broadcaster) were “tragically familiar”.
Te Archbishop said: “It’s not just a Government
issue, it needs housing associations, national government, local government, landowners. We need a revolution in social housing and affordable housing to sort it.” When asked what hope he has that all of the
various bodies will act, he said it is a “considerable uphill struggle” and that the problem could take 10 years to solve. “Tis has been going on for 30 or 40 years,” he added.
12 | HMMFebruary/March 2022 |
www.housingmmonline.co.uk
He then said: “We need people who say, ‘In
politics, my life’s ambition is to deal with that – I want to be the person who goes down in the history books as having made a difference on this in my local government or at national level’. “We need landlords who say, ‘I’m not happy with
building another estate of unaffordable houses...’ “We need to build communities, not just houses. And that’s what will change things most fundamentally.” While the Archbishop said it would take at
least 10 years to solve the problem, he said “acute issues”, such as mould growing across ceilings in tenants’ homes, could be solved in as little time as three months.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60