FROM THE DESK OF THE EDITOR Air Ambulance: Are the systems making us safer?
When I first began flying helicopter EMS in 1999 and my first director of ops told me that he would rather see me turn down a flight and go back to sleep than push weather limits, I was so lucky. However, the go/no-go decision was still my sole decision to make. At the time, I probably did not appreciate my director’s sentiment as much as I should have.
Opposite that sentiment, I was recently eating dinner with a senior pilot who’d been in the air ambulance business for more than 30 years. Over a beer, he explained the process of how flights were accepted back in the early days.
The initial phone callout provided crew with patient location and injury type. The pilot would assess weather using limited sources (as compared to today) and make a go/no-go decision. If the weather was bad, they were encouraged to go “stick their nose in it” to see if the pilot could find a way to complete the flight. “There was a time when pilots were incentivized to figure out a way to complete flights and were paid a bonus for each completed patient flight.” He went on to say that he could not remember the exact amount, but it was something like $50 per flight. I incredulously asked, “Let me get this straight, pilots were paid $50 to figure out how to complete a flight?”
Additionally, back in the early days, pilots may have viewed the medical crew as “walking baggage” with little-to-no input on whether or not to accept the flight.
Lyn Burks, Editor-In-Chief
Rotorcraft Pro® is published six times a year and
mailed out on or around the 10th of every other month by: Rotorcraft Pro Media Netwok, Inc. Rotorcraft Pro®
per year for foreign is
distributed free to qualified subscribers. Non-qualified subscription rates are $57.00 per year in the U.S. and Canada, $125.00
Publisher is not liable for all content (including
editorial and illustrations provided by advertisers) of ads published, and does not accept responsibility for any claims made against the publisher. It is the advertiser’s or agency’s responsibility to obtain appropriate releases on any item or individuals pictured in ads. Reproduction of this magazine in whole or in part is prohibited without prior written permission from the publisher.
4 Sep/Oct 2019 subscribers
(surface mail). U.S. postage paid at Fall River, Wisconsin, and additional mailing offices.
Editor-In-Chief Lyn Burks
lyn.burks@rotorcraftpro.com Account Executive
Teri Rivas
teri.rivas@rotorcraftpro.com Brad Shubargo
brad@rotorcraftpro.com Circulation Manager
Laura Lentz Layout Design
Bryan Matuskey Boris Grauden
production@rotorcraftpro.com
Online Accounts Manager Lynnette Burks
lynnette.burks@rotorcraftpro.com Copy Editors
Rick Weatherford
Joanna Nellans Social Media Guru Laura Lentz
Conributing Writers James Careless Randy Mains Joanna Nellans Brad McNally Rick Weatherford Tim Pruitt
Randy Rowles Sharon Desfor Matt Johnson Scott Skola
Corporate Officers Lyn Burks / CEO
Mailing Address
367 SW Bluebird Ct. Ft. White, FL 32038
Toll Free: 877.768.5550 Fax: 561.424.8036
www.
rotorcraftpro.com
Fast-forward 30 years and the decision-making process from start to finish is no longer only on the shoulders of the pilot, but more of a team effort. Don’t get me wrong; regulations state the pilot- in-command still has ultimate authority regarding aeronautical decision-making, but the modern-day air ambulance pilot has far more resources to aid in making decisions.
The most common safety initiative has been the introduction of the FRAT (Flight Risk Assessment Tool). This process takes decision-making beyond the pilot and to other team members and supervisors to help him/her make decisions.
Many operators have also created a robust operational control center (OCC), which creates another toolbox for the pilot and crew to access during a flight. OCCs, typically staffed 24/7/365, may include a pilot, maintenance, and medically trained communications specialists as well as up-to-the-minute weather information. The goal of an OCC is to provide pilots with the information they need when they need it, prior to or during a flight, to aid the decision-making process and make safety a team effort.
Accident rates in air ambulance have been cut by more than half since the 1980s as systems have been improved, but we still have several accidents every year. With proper training, a team effort, and more resources than ever, HAA should continue to be one of the safest sectors of our industry.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82 |
Page 83 |
Page 84 |
Page 85 |
Page 86 |
Page 87 |
Page 88 |
Page 89 |
Page 90
