search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
#Sponsored Content ONE MISSED FLIGHT


HOW TRAGEDY LED TO A PARADIGM SHIFT IN MAINTENANCE STANDARDS AND THE START OF A NEW BUSINESS


A personal story that inspired action as told by DALE NEUBAUER A&P and CEO of HeliLadder


The call came in: A young child had been in a serious accident, and the air ambulance was needed. In the world of EMS aviation, not all flights are “life- critical,” but this one was. Unfortunately, the helicopter was grounded while I performed a scheduled inspection, and it never left the hospital. The child did not survive.


When I arrived home that evening, my son met me at the door and gave me a hug. It was bittersweet, as forefront in my mind was the fact that some other dad was being deprived of the same treasured opportunity.


Would the child’s outcome have been different if I’d been able to complete the


inspection sooner? I could only


speculate, but the missed flight haunted me and ultimately changed the course of how I performed my job as an aircraft mechanic, how I advocated for my profession, and why I eventually developed a new product and business.


Moving forward from that fateful day, I came to understand that if a flight program


is not actively supporting the process of quality maintenance, it 26 Sept/Oct 2025


is, by default, impeding the process. However, this does not simply put the burden of “supporting maintenance” on management’s shoulders. Rather, it is first and foremost the technician’s responsibility to carefully and thoroughly self-evaluate their worksite environment for ways to enhance their professional performance.


Taking on the role of a “reluctant activist,” I advocated for the establishment of


common-sense standards for hospital aviation programs. The industry was long overdue in recognizing the need for: duty-time limitations for mechanics, improving hangar lighting, limiting worksite distractions, establishing training requirements, etc.


Over the course of time, positive headway was made regarding “maintenance standards,”


but a paradigm shift


in the ladders used by A&Ps was also


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92