search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
By Matt Johnson


BEHIND THE SCENES HOW THE SAUSAGE IS MADE!


Don’t tell my AME, but I love sausage (OK, actually I love bacon, but bacon doesn’t fit my analogy.) Don’t fret, my column isn’t going to be about breakfast meats, nor my diet for that matter. Instead, I want to talk about how things are made or derived behind the scenes as it relates to electronic aviation applications (apps).


We don’t always know how our tasty sausage was processed behind the scenes, and frankly, I don’t care to see how it’s made! However, I do care about how various aviation apps derive their calculations, as you should care as an applicant for any practical test. Let me explain. I’ll warn you, this month’s column is packed full of questions, and if you don’t know the answers, I suggest you figure them out before your next practical exam.


Before I get too deep, I want to add a quick disclaimer here. I am not opposed to electronic flight bags (EFBs); I absolutely love utilizing them on a daily basis, both as a Designated Pilot Evaluator and as a single pilot IFR air medical captain. I couldn’t imagine in today’s aviation age not using EFBs and still being able to maintain the same level of effectiveness and efficiency. The debate regarding EFBs and practical exams was finally settled last May with the introduction of the Airman Certification Standards for us on the helicopter side of the industry. Prior to this, the allowance of whether EFBs and apps could be utilized during the practical exam seemed to be on a case-by-case basis, depending on the evaluator. Now, we have clear guidance. Here’s an example: in the Private Pilot ACS, we find the following statement under Task D, Cross-Country Flight Planning: “Note: Preparation, presentation, and explanation of a computer-generated flight plan is an acceptable option.” If


80 July/Aug 2025


that isn’t convincing enough, continue on to the Risk Management section of this task and note that one of the items reads “Use of an electronic flight bag (EFB), if used.” This statement Indicates that your EFB is one of the items that a DPE can ask about if you use an EFB. Remember, we must ask about at least one item! To further drive home the point, take a look at the Skills section of Task D, where it reads: “The applicant exhibits the skill to: Use an electronic flight bag (EFB), if applicable.” So, if you plan on using your favorite flight planning app on an iPad (EFB) during your practical exam, then you must know how to use it! (As a reminder, under the Skills area: All elements must be evaluated.)


For even more clarification, let’s jump to “Appendix 3: Aircraft, Equipment, and Operational Requirements & Limitations” found in the back of the Private Pilot ACS, and you will find the following statement:


“If the applicant has trained using a portable electronic flight bag (EFB) to display charts and data, and wishes to use the EFB during the practical test, the applicant is expected to demonstrate appropriate knowledge, risk management, and skill appropriate to its use.”


So, what about how the app is made or how it works? This is where weaknesses are observed in relation to EFBs. Take, for example, the Cross-Country Planning section. That magenta line that you see from Point A to Point B on your popular app: Is that line a True Course or Magnetic Course? What’s the difference? Does it matter? Of course it does! What makes these apps so powerful is they do most everything for you behind the scenes. But what if all you have is a paper sectional, and you have to figure out a Magnetic


Course from a True Course based on the closest isogonic line? Speaking of sectionals, what if you see a symbol that you don’t know the meaning of? You do know where to find the legend in the app, right?


Here’s another area where I often encounter an applicant stress point: basic


weight-and-balance package that calculations.


I get it; the apps are fast, easy and often incorporated in an all-in-one flight planning


makes them


convenient. However, at any applicant level you need to know the basic arithmetic involved in calculating total weights, moments, and of course a CG, both longitudinal and lateral.


I would be remiss if I didn’t close out with one more critical item: performance! While the app processes in milliseconds, you still need to know where to find those in and out of ground-effect hover charts in your Rotorcraft Flight Manual. What three variables do you need to know the hover performance capability? Given a set of hypothetical variables, you do know how to determine that information with a “raw” chart, right?


I think you get the point. Apps are amazing. They make our lives easy and efficient when used correctly. But when your EFB isn’t available (because your iPad overheats, dies, etc.), you need to know how to make your own sausage.


Matt Johnson has been an FAA designated pilot examiner for over a decade, conducting exams ranging from Private to ATP and CFI. Additionally, he is a single-pilot IFR air medical captain, Part 135 instructor, and check airman. He can be reached at HelicopterDPE@gmail. com and via Twitter @HelicopterDPE


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84