search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Orthopaedics


injuries beyond the conventional timeframe. With these tools, surgeons can confidently


tackle tendon repairs ranging from three weeks to two months post-injury, expanding treatment options and improving patient outcomes. They lead to reduced surgical time and frustration, reduced cost of surgery and free up operating rooms and personnel. In addition, the sheath retractor and suture retriever provide faster return to normality, ensuring patient satisfaction, as well as minimising the chance of repeat surgery, that may result in replacing the tendon with different kinds of implants. These tools ensure non-traumatic tendon


surgery, streamlined suture retrieval within the sheath and, by minimising tissue trauma and enabling dilation of contracted tendon sheaths, they are ideal tools to navigate the treacherous terrain of “No Man’s Land”.


Savings


Cost cutting should not prevail over long term cost savings that can be made by improving access to key surgical tools. In fact, when a wider range of factors than the simple cost per item of surgical tools is taken into account, it becomes clear that getting surgery right quickly, simply and first time equates to a huge saving. Clearly, the longer surgery takes, the higher the costs to the healthcare system as more staff are occupied for longer, using more resources such as anaesthesia and monitoring machinery as well as occupying the OR longer, reducing the number of surgeries that could be carried out by the surgical centre in any given day. If surgery is not successful in restoring the


patient to complete mobility, then the system may incur additional and corrective surgeries as well as need for additional temporary implants. Makeshift tools are more likely to result in surgeries taking longer and causing surgical trauma, while longer surgeries, where the surgeon is battling with inadequate tools, or having to “MacGyver” new ones out of whatever is at hand, are a risk to the patient that is anaesthetised in the OR for longer, but also put the surgeon at risk of exhaustion. For surgeons, having to resort to on-the-fly solutions may lead to sub-optimal outcomes, with lasting consequences that can endure a lifetime and potentially even result in disability for patients. Surgeons, find themselves in difficult positions where the tools and resources at their disposal may not suffice to achieve the best possible results. This predicament not only compromises patient care but also inflicts a heavy toll on the morale and job


and moral dilemmas of delivering subpar care due to external constraints beyond their control. The pressures to reduce costs in healthcare settings should not overshadow the imperative of ensuring optimal patient outcomes. It’s not surprising therefore to find that


satisfaction of surgeons themselves. Surgeons facing resource limitations and inadequate tools are thus placed in untenable positions, where their ability to fulfil their professional duties is compromised. Consequently, job satisfaction among surgeons is likely to plummet as they grapple with the ethical


surgeons are increasingly compelled to advocate for their patients, striving to secure the necessary resources and support. However, this responsibility should not fall solely on the shoulders of individual surgeons. Healthcare systems and institutions must prioritise providing surgeons with the essential tools and resources required to perform their duties effectively. By investing in the infrastructure and equipment necessary for optimal patient care, healthcare organisations can uphold their commitment to both patients and healthcare


Adaptable. Seamlessly adjusts to any


surgeon in any surgical environment.


Versatile. One system, built for


multiple specialities.


Digitally Driven. Empowering informed clinical


decisions through data and insights.


hello.uki@cmrsurgical.com Find out more or contact us


MADE IN BRITAIN


Disclaimer: Versius Plus is part of a Versius ecosystem comprised of the Versius Surgical System, the EIZO CuratOR product, the vLimeLite visualisation system, the Versius Ultrasonic Dissector, and a suite of electrosurgical and non-electrosurgical instruments. vLimeLite and Versius are trade marks or registered trade marks of CMR Surgical in the UK and other countries. EIZO, the EIZO logo, and CuratOR are trade marks or registered trade marks of EIZO Corporation in Japan and other countries. Disclaimer: The Versius Plus offering and the product associated with are not launched globally. Availability in your region can vary. Please check availability of the product in your country with your local representative or your local customer service. The Versius Plus offering is not approved for sale in the U.S.


October 2025 I www.clinicalservicesjournal.com 51


t


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68