search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Theatre equipment


with advanced technologies, and prioritise patient safety by preventing pressure injuries and maintaining stability. Their adaptability ensures they meet the evolving needs of surgical teams while streamlining workflows in high-pressure environments.


Emerging trends and innovations in operating tables The evolution of operating tables is often driven by the need to integrate with cutting- edge technologies, enhance patient safety, and improve operational efficiency. Below, we explore the key trends shaping the future of operating tables, reflecting advancements that are transforming surgical care.


Hybrid operating room integration Hybrid operating rooms, which combine surgical and advanced imaging capabilities, are increasingly common in specialties like cardiovascular surgery, neurosurgery, and orthopaedic trauma. Operating tables in these environments are often designed to function as part of an integrated imaging suite. Featuring radiolucent carbon-fibre tabletops, these tables allow unobstructed X-ray, fluoroscopy, or CT imaging without repositioning the patient. Some tables are dockable, enabling seamless


transfer into imaging scanners, while others communicate with imaging systems to adjust guidance overlays in real time as the table’s position changes. This integration can eliminate the need to move patients between surfaces, reducing procedural interruptions and enabling complex interventions, such as combining minimally invasive endovascular repairs with open surgery, in a single setting. For hospital


specifiers and architects, designing operating rooms to accommodate these advanced tables is beneficial to maximising their utility and ensuring compatibility with imaging equipment.


Robotic surgery compatibility The rise of robot-assisted surgery, exemplified by systems like the da Vinci platform, has spurred innovations in operating tables that enhance compatibility with robotic systems. Some tables offer synchronised movement, allowing repositioning during surgery without


undocking robotic arms. For instance, integrated table motion technology enables the table to communicate with the robot’s software, adjusting arm positions as the table tilts or raises to maintain surgical precision. This capability may be particularly valuable


in urology, gynaecology, and general surgery, where dynamic repositioning can improve exposure mid-procedure. Many tables are also designed with mounting points and profiles to accommodate the robot’s footprint, ensuring stability despite the forces exerted by robotic arms. These advancements can streamline robotic workflows, reduce setup times, and enhance surgical outcomes, making them a key consideration for facilities investing in robotic surgery programmes.


Advanced materials and imaging optimisation The shift towards radiolucent materials, particularly carbon fibre, is a modern trend in operating table design. These materials minimise X-ray attenuation, ensuring clear imaging across specialties, from orthopaedics to urology. Single-column table designs, replacing older four-post models, provide nearly 360-degree access for C-arm imaging and surgical teams, while also simplifying cleaning and reducing obstructions in the operating room. Some manufacturers are prioritising designs that maximise imaging compatibility, with features like offset support columns,


24 www.clinicalservicesjournal.com I October 2025


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68