search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
CONSTRUCTION


Unlocking value in Modern Methods of Construction


Modern Methods of Construction (MMC) are increasingly discussed in the construction and healthcare engineering press, as well as referenced in government policymaking. Across the NHS estate, decision- makers must now consider incorporating MMC into all future projects. MMC can appear complex, with different approaches to choose from, and many considerations for design programmes. Here, Jaimie Johnston, director and head of Global Systems at Bryden Wood, a company of creative technologists, designers, architects, engineers, and analysts, discusses ‘why MMC is so relevant for healthcare, the range of options available, and what you need to know about incorporating MMC into new projects’.


Modern Methods of Construction (or ‘MMC’ for short) is an approach that seeks to improve the productivity, health and safety, sustainability, and quality, of construction projects, while reducing time and cost. MMC achieves these benefits by combining: n A manufacturing-like approach to the design and assembly of the physical components and assemblies that make up an asset (the focus of this article), with:


n A range of digital tools and workflows that improve outcomes across the whole project lifecycle, facilitating better stakeholder engagement, design, procurement, delivery, commissioning, and operation.


Driven by new government policy For several years, the UK government has been working on how to transform the construction sector and overcome chronically low productivity while reducing the sector’s huge contribution to carbon emissions. Most recently, the Construction Playbook (published by the Cabinet Office on 8 December last year), set out a series of policies to enable ‘better, greener, and faster’ delivery of infrastructure, supporting recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic, and building a resilient economy for the future. MMC is a central component, and is described in the publication as: ‘covering a range of offsite manufacturing and onsite techniques’. It goes on to say: ‘MMC provides alternatives to traditional methods, and has the potential to deliver significant improvements in productivity, efficiency, and quality for both the construction industry and public sector.’


Crucial to delivering to the HIP Specifically, MMC will be a crucial element in the design and delivery of the Health Infrastructure Plan due to the benefits outlined by Martin Rooney, National


38 Health Estate Journal March 2021 Medical + clinical spaces 44.6%


Figure 1: Data visualisation across the healthcare estate.


Other 55.4%


Estates Delivery lead for NHS England and NHS Improvement, in his letter to all NHS Trust directors of Estates in August 2020. In it, he said: “In addition to enabling a reduced on-site component assembly time, due to offsite factory production to a pre-agreed quality standard, MMC also reduces the size of onsite construction teams, disruption to site, health and safety risk, and post-completion defects. MMC can also help in overcoming a skills shortage in the construction industry, and should see a reduction in project time and cost, while improving safety and quality throughout the whole of an asset’s life.”


What this means for healthcare Healthcare facilities have some key features that will guide the appropriate application of MMC, and make it easier for Trusts to navigate the field and the range of options available, including: n Technically specific areas, e.g. theatres and imaging suites that have a greater


density of mechanical and electrical services (MEP) and equipment than is typically found in other parts of the public sector estate.


n A large variation in the density of MEP between the most intensely serviced areas, such as theatres, the less intensely served clinical areas, such as inpatient bedrooms, and non-clinical spaces, such as waiting rooms and circulation spaces.


n Continuous evolution of medical technology and clinical best practice, requiring future adaptability and flexibility.


n Use of standard room types (many of which have been pre-designed, e.g.P22 repeatable rooms), often with a high degree of repetition, such as in wards.


n Stringent requirements for response factor and vibration characteristics of structural slabs.


n Specific requirements for finishes as regards cleaning and infection control.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76