search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
MATERIALS | WIRE & CABLE


The study compared a typical crack resistant


sheathing compound against two alternatives where 1.5 % of the coupling agent was replaced by the Innospec waxes. The formulation containing Viscospeed HP proved to have the best flow and displayed acceptable mechanical properties. However, the semi-crystalline nature of the polar Viscowax 1440 resulted in a negative impact in the crack test at 50°C.


Bornschein says the formulation containing


Viscowax 1440 also showed a positive impact on flow of the final compound formulation together with an improvement in tear strength. Oven tests show that the wax improves processability without negatively affecting crucial crack resistance.


According to the researchers, the ability to use a


Shielding innovations Turning to shielding solutions, Manel Miret, Area Manager and New Product Developer at master- batch maker Delta Tecnic, and Bruno Reis Figue- iredo, Co-CEO at graphene specialist Graphenest, detailed work the two companies have undertaken to evaluate the use of graphene-loaded com- pounds to replace metal meshes, wires and braids as shielding elements in cables.


polymer-based shielding layer would simplify manufacturing, increase production speed and result in a lighter and more flexible cable (impor- tant in mobility applications). Metals are also not very effective shielding options at GHz frequencies, they add, while conductive polymers have been shown to be effective at these frequencies (which will be used for 6G mobile networks). The study has shown that graphene-loaded


Above: Innospec


claims its wax additives can help reduce sheath cracking risk


IMAGE: INNOSPEC


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64