ADDITIVES | IMPACT MODIFIERS
Table 1 and 2: Impact test results for Elastron D400 at -15°C and 23°C for recycled PP and recycled HIPS compounds
Source: Elastron
for compounds containing mineral fillers such as ATH and MDH halogen free flame retardants. Olebond 7404 and 7405 are ABS and EVA based
grades for used as compatibilisers and coupling agents for use with filled and fibre reinforced immiscible polymer systems based on PA or PC.
TPEs for impact Sustainability concerns are becoming increasingly evident in the area of impact modification. “The demand for products made from recycled materials is rising, meaning that recyclability of polymers is becoming increasingly important,” says Martin Bradbury, Dryflex TPE Impact Modifiers Expert at Hexpol TPE. “However, thermomechanical degra- dation from repeated melting during the recycling process, weathering and contamination can all have negative effects on properties and performance.” Bradbury says Dryflex TPEs have long been used as impact modifiers and, when added to recyclate, can “help transform” properties. Dryflex impact modifiers can be added to the recyclate, helping to transform the properties from stiff and brittle to flexible and tough and improve the impact resistance and aesthetics of the finished product. Hexpol TPE says the materials are being used as impact modifiers in both primary and secondary recyclate supply streams. Dryflex TPE impact modifiers can also function as a compatibiliser when used with commingled sources of polar and non-polar polymers such as PP, PE and PS. Added to an immiscible polymer blend, the TPE modifies interfacial properties and stabilises the morphology to create a polymer alloy and to improve the dispersion and processing characteristics. Depending on the purity of the recycled polymer feedstock, the company says addition of Dryflex TPE can also help to improve
30 COMPOUNDING WORLD | April 2021
melt viscosity, aid processing and reduce cycle times. In comparison to pure PS, the introduction of Dryflex TPE impact modifiers can also improve the ease of de-moulding injection moulded parts. “In the past we have seen a rather inconsistent
approach to impact modification, where any available compounds or polymers are thrown into the recyclate mix. This can lead to inconsistencies and unpredictable results. With our Dryflex TPE impact modifier grades we have adopted a more qualified approach,” says Bradbury. “We have tested many different formulations with both virgin and recycled polymer for impact strength and have also compared these results against data collated from common materials used in the industry such as pure SBS. The Dryflex TPE impact modifier grades help to increase the value, processability and potential applications for recovered PP and PS,” he adds. Hexpol recommends adding Dryflex TPE impact modifier grades at loadings by weight of between 5 and 25%. For example, in a grade of PS regrind, it reports that a 15% addition of Dryflex TPE results in a 160% increase in notched Charpy impact resistance. In a virgin crystal polystyrene, a 25% addition gave an increase of more than 430%. Turkish compounder Elastron also has TPE
grades for modifying impact performance of various thermoplastics, including virgin and recycled polyolefins and styrenics as well as PA and PC. “Elastron has developed a broad range of SEBS, SBS and TPO-based TPE modifiers that can improve impact resistance, elasticity, and mechani- cal properties across a broad temperature range,” says Jon Wise, who is responsible for the compa- ny’s marketing activity in the US. “Elastron tests show the potential for notable improvement in impact performance through
www.compoundingworld.com
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68 |
Page 69 |
Page 70 |
Page 71 |
Page 72 |
Page 73 |
Page 74 |
Page 75 |
Page 76 |
Page 77 |
Page 78 |
Page 79 |
Page 80 |
Page 81 |
Page 82