Silent towing carriage towing a model


Furthermore, the European Union has included URN in methodological standards to classify the environmental status of the sea. Presently the focus is on monitoring URN such as the ECHO initiative lead by the Vancouver Fraser Port Authority.


Model tests in the design stage The URN of a ship can be estimated by means of computations and model tests during the design stage. We regularly carry out model tests to determine the URN of cavitating propellers in our Depressurised Wave Basin. This unique facility is a towing tank com- bining a free surface with the capability to lower air pressure and enabling the use of a complete ship model. Effects such as the wake field, wave pattern and dynamic trim and sinkage of the ship are automatically taken into account.


Hydrophones are affixed on a bottom- mounted mast to measure the URN below the keel and to the side of the ship. The ship model sails over the hydrophones, thereby mimicking a full-scale noise range. A typical upper frequency limit for the measurements is 20 kHz at full scale.


Background noise has to be low enough to avoid interference with the cavitation noise measurements. The main sources of back- ground noise are the towing carriage and the propeller drive train. Therefore, we have installed a lightweight, silent towing carriage fitted with polyurethane wheels. To reduce noise from the propeller drive train, solid shafts and special bearings are used.


Background noise To check the background noise level we carry out a


measurement for non-cavitating conditions or with a dummy hub replacing the propeller. The noise of the cavitating condition should be at least 3 dB, and preferably more than 10 dB, higher than the (non-cavitating) background noise. The figure shows back- ground noise (green line) and cavitation noise (blue line) measured at model scale.


Test conditions are based on propulsion characteristics of the ship and the scale factor. In some cases a reduction of the cavitation number is applied to mitigate the viscous scale effects on the inception of vortex cavitation. We have recently tested this new method and achieved good results.


The measured data should be processed accounting for the influence of acoustic characteristics of the facility. Only the part of the measurement where the distance between the noise source and the receiver is smaller than the reverberation radius should be analysed. Interference between direct noise and reflections of sound from the free surface influences the measured noise levels and should be corrected for. Noise levels are then normalised to a distance of one metre, while taking the time-dependent distance between the ship model and the hydrophones into account. Finally, we convert the results to full-scale values in one-third octave bands.


Validation studies Several validation studies have recently been carried out to determine the accuracy of the scaled-up results of the URN model tests. One such study was performed within the EU FP7 SONIC project (see MARIN Report 118). Another case is a single-screw merchant vessel for which an extensive full-scale data


set is available from the CRS1 . These validation


studies show that model tests are a reliable way of checking the noise levels from propeller cavitation, which can be used to assess environmental impact. This helps to make shipping silent and to keep the oceans quiet.


Recent MARIN papers on URN model tests: - Bosschers, J., Lafeber, F.H., de Boer, J., Bosman, R. and Bouvy, A. (2013). “Underwater Radiated Noise Measurements with a Silent Towing Carriage in the Depressurized Wave Basin”, AMT’13, Gdansk, Poland


- Lafeber, F.H., Bosschers, J., de Jong, C. and Graafland, F. (2015). “Acoustic Reverberation Measurements in the Depressurized Wave Basin”, AMT’15, Istanbul, Turkey


- Lafeber, F.H. and Bosschers, J. (2016). “Validation of computational and experimen- tal prediction methods for the underwater radiated noise of a small research vessel”, PRADS2016, Copenhagen, Denmark


1. http://www.crships.org/


45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95


cavitating non-cavitating


102


103 frequency [Hz] Sound pressure level of a model test for cavitating and non-cavitating conditions report 21


104


105


sounpd pressure level [dB]


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28