search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
BUSINESS


structure information may be available from chemists’ individual electronic laboratory notebooks (ELN) but the affiliated unit operation details and the complete supporting molecular characterisation data are not usually directly


available. Then some of that data and interpreted information may have been


transcribed into spreadsheets. In those spreadsheets, synthetic


Developers are challenged to process, assemble, and review appropriate material and process information in order to perform this important risk assessment effectively


process and supporting analytical and chromatographic data are abstracted to numbers, text and images, and the raw data is stored in archives. Separate reports are often needed to assemble subsets of analytical characterisation information and interpretations. The analytical information is


transposed for decision-making purposes, but review of the decision-supporting data is, at best, impractical because it has been sequestered into different systems. Batch-to-batch comparison data


is also transcribed into spreadsheets in an attempt to bring all the relevant information together into one system—unfortunately not one well suited to support rich chemical


and scientific information. Project teams spend weeks on the assembly of this information for internal reporting and external submissions. This abstracted and repeatedly transcribed information is then reviewed to establish and implement control strategies in compliance with a QbD approach. Users need the ability to aggregate all of the information, data and knowledge in a single, integrated, and interoperable platform. Project teams must be able to search, review and update the information on a continual basis as projects progress and evolve. Data access should support sharing of data for collaborative research while protecting data integrity. Furthermore, from the perspective


of preserving the rich scientific information therein, an ideal informatics system will also limit the need for data abstraction. While data abstraction serves a purpose – reduction of voluminous data to pieces of knowledge – it also brings limitations since important details, knowledge and contextual information can be lost. In order to address all these


challenges, a next-generation informatics infrastructure is required.


10 | 2017 35


GETTY


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52