search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
In the following photo essay, photojournalist Tailyr Irvine explores the issues that blood quantum requirements for tribal enrollment pose for Native Americans. The concept of us- ing so-called “blood quantum”—or amount of tribal affi liation in a person’s ancestry—to determine tribal enrollment eligibility has no basis in Native American traditions. In the early 1900s, the U.S. government began imposing this system on tribes as a means of defi ning and limiting citizenship. While a number of tribes still use this method for determining eligibility for tribal enrollment, other Native nations use documentation of a person’s descent from an enrollee on a desig- nated tribal roll or census records. Many scholars argue that blood quantum requirements were calculated to reduce tribal


WHAT IS BLOOD QUANTUM?


The notion of “blood quantum” sprang from U.S. colonial and racial biases. Non-Native people devised this way to defi ne Native American identity by degree of affi liation to a tribe in their family ancestry. For example, if a person has ancestors who all descended from one American Indian tribe and has a child with someone who is not a member of that tribe, their child would have a blood quantum of ½. If this child grows up and becomes a parent with someone who is not a citizen of his or her tribe, their offspring would have a blood quantum of ¼. For those tribes that use blood quantum as a criterion for tribal enrollment, the minimum blood quantum requirements vary and have ranged from ½ to ¹⁄16.


enrollment over time. Moreover, they call atten- tion to the U.S. government’s detrimental use of the term during the 19th century and early 20th century to associate a Native person’s level of intelligence with their supposed amount of Native versus Euro-American or other blood. For “Reservation Mathematics: Navigating


Love in Native America,” Irvine interviewed Indigenous residents in Missoula and on her Flathead Indian Reservation in western Mon- tana. They share their deep personal, social and political concerns about the blood quantum system, which can impact Native Americans’ most personal decisions—including with whom they have children. Through intimate stories, Irvine shows how blood quantum re- quirements are increasingly putting pressures on Native Americans’ lives.


e MAP IDAHO


r


SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION 25


F


a l


t


h


e


a d


R


i


v


M


e


s


r


i s


o


u


r


i


R i


v


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52