search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Ulua River vessel (detail) depicting dancers, AD 750-850, Yuscaran, El Paraisso Department, Honduras. Pottery, clay slip, paint. Formerly in the collection of Marco Aurelio Soto, former president of Honduras: MAI purchase, 1917 (6/1259).


SINCE THE 1980S, THE U.S. ALSO HAS SIGNED BILATERAL AGREEMENTS WITH EL SALVADOR,


GUATEMALA, HONDURAS, NICARAGUA AND OTHER COUNTRIES TO PROTECT ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES, PREVENT LOOTING AND RECOVER ILLEGALLY EXPORTED OBJECTS.


and 1970s, Americans working in Panama conducted amateur archaeological digs. Their finds of gold and ceramics fed art-market demand, encouraging further looting and de- struction of archaeological information that can never be recovered.


PROTECTING PATRIMONY The response to this damage has evolved in re- cent decades. Museums with Central Ameri- can collections are often accused of robbing nations of their cultural patrimony. But in the days before antiquities protection laws, Central American scholars, politicians and citizens intentionally placed archaeological collections in foreign museums. Entire private collections were sometimes sold to U.S. muse- ums to maintain their integrity. For instance,


Dr. Jorge Lines, an historian and anthropolo- gist at Costa Rica’s National University, dedi- cated himself to advancing understanding of indigenous Costa Rican cultures and provided items to MAI. More recently, concern over illegal antiq-


uities trafficking led to the United Nations’ UNESCO 1970 Convention on the Means of Prohibiting and Preventing the Illicit Import, Export and Transfer of Ownership of Cultural Property. The Convention identified archaeo- logical objects and sites as national patrimony that deserved protection against theft and destruction. Since the 1980s, the U.S. also has signed bilateral agreements with El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua and other countries to protect archaeological sites, pre- vent looting and recover illegally exported ob-


Drilled pendants like this were worn horizontally on the chest and may have been combined with other elements to make complex necklaces. Greater Nicoya snake pendant, 300 BC-AD 500, jadeite. Costa Rica Nicoya, Guanacaste Province. Gift of Arthur M. Sackler, 1966. (23/7284)


jects. Despite these steps, trade in antiquities, looting and destruction of archaeological sites continues. Beyond protection of the physical objects,


Central American people are now reclaiming the interpretation of their own past. Early studies of Central America’s past were almost exclusively the work of North Americans or other foreigners. But today, Central America’s own archaeologists, curators and other schol- ars – including indigenous people – are as- suming authority over their culture, history and associated collections. Their aim is to pre- serve and interpret Central American national and cultural heritage for the benefit of their own people. The Ceramica de los Ancestros exhibit, a joint


effort of the Museum and the Smithsonian La- tino Center, is a trail-breaking effort to help tell these stories.X – Ann McMullen and Alex Benitez.


Ann McMullen is head of the Collections Research and Documentation Department at the National Museum of the American Indian – Smithsonian. She and Prof. Benitez of George Mason University are co-curators of Ceramica de los Ancestros.


24 AMERICAN INDIAN SUMMER 2013


PHOTOS BY ERNEST AMOROSO


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68