COVER STORY MAKING THE GRADE
Poorly specified access covers can create costly problems across all education settings. Andrea Polti, Technical Product Manager at ACO Building Drainage, explains how FACTA compliance, correct specification and thoughtful product choice can prevent failure, keep essential services safely accessible while matching the surrounding aesthetics.
Schools, colleges, universities, campus buildings and halls of residence - these are some of the most demanding environments for facilities managers. High footfall, constant movement of equipment, strict hygiene requirements and the need for discreet access to underground services all place pressure on the infrastructure beneath staff and students’ feet. Among the most forgotten about components are access covers – yet specifying the wrong one can lead to safety risks, premature failure, and costly disruption.
As enquiries from education estates typically surge in late spring and early summer – when refurbishment programmes ramp up – now is the ideal moment for facilities and estates managers to reassess what ‘good’ looks like when selecting access covers for these settings.
Load rating lessons One of the biggest challenges in the market is the variation in how access covers and their associated load performance is described. Many are advertised with claims such as being able to withstand a ‘10 ton load capacity’, but often, they come without reference to any recognised test standard. In practice, this tells facilities managers very little about how the cover will perform under real world conditions.
This is where FACTA, the UK’s dedicated body for access cover specification and testing, plays a vital role. While there are existing BS EN standards for heavy duty manhole covers, there isn’t anything equivalent for the lighter duty, building based covers like those used in education environments. This is why FACTA was established, and it breaks down load classes into more relevant categories, including AA and AAA, which are typically suited to schools and universities.
Crucially, FACTA defines access cover testing criteria, ensuring consistency and comparability in the industry. For example, AA-rated covers are capable of withstanding a 1.5 tonne (15kN) slow moving pneumatic wheel load (SMWL). These make them suitable for pedestrian areas and light trolleys, while AAA covers are designed for heavier service trolleys – common in catering, maintenance and laboratory environments – as they can accept 2.5 tonne (25kN) SMWLs.
Facilities managers should always ask for the test report behind any load claim, as this is the closest way to verifying the cover will perform as expected.
Specifying covers that make the grade Education buildings are diverse, and so are their flooring types. The right access cover must integrate seamlessly with its surroundings – both visually and functionally. In this respect, there are four main choices to pick from – recessed aluminium covers, vinyl flooring covers, SMART composite-filled covers, and solid aluminium covers
24 | TOMORROW’S FM
Recessed aluminium covers These are the most common choice for education settings. They are supplied with a recessed tray that can be infilled on site to match the surrounding floor finish. This ensures a consistent aesthetic, whether the floor is vinyl, tile, carpet or concrete. The flexibility to match existing finishes is particularly valuable in refurbishment projects.
Vinyl flooring covers In corridors, kitchens, laboratories and hygiene sensitive areas, vinyl flooring covers are often preferred. These access covers allow the vinyl flooring to be welded directly to the cover’s perimeter, creating a seamless, easy to clean surface. This reduces dirt traps and supports infection control standards.
SMART composite filled covers Where speed of installation is critical – such as during short holiday shutdowns – SMART covers offer a major advantage. These covers are prefilled with a structural composite, eliminating the need for concrete mixing indoors. Facilities teams simply need to bed the cover in place and apply the final floor finish. They are also lighter than concrete filled alternatives, reducing manual handling risks.
Solid aluminium covers For areas where matching the floor finish is not required, solid aluminium covers provide a ready to install solution. They are thinner, lighter and suitable for plant rooms or back of house spaces.
Specification 101 for facilities managers Beyond choosing the right type of cover, several technical details can make or break an installation.
1. Clear opening versus overall frame size
This is one of the most common specification errors. The clear opening is the usable access space – the dimension that matters for maintenance teams. The overall frame size is larger and should not be used when matching to an existing chamber. Confusing the two can lead to costly rework.
2. Seal integrity
Education buildings often house drainage, electrical or mechanical chambers where odour control and spill containment are essential. High quality covers typically include two or three seals, including a grit seal, to prevent both ingress and egress. Cheaper plain seated covers may have only one seal, or none at all.
3. Slip and trip prevention
Slip resistance depends on the chosen floor finish, but installation quality is equally important. A cover that protrudes even slightly above the floor surface becomes a trip hazard highlighting the need for correct bedding and levelling.
twitter.com/TomorrowsFM
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54
