the solution for antigen unmasking
Ki-67 (antibody MIB1) Now you can:
Run antigen unmasking in 6 various buffers at once.
Perform gentle antigen retrieval that does not damage the tissue morphology.
Get identical results every time.
Compare series of slides treated in independent sessions.
The Retriever
Our Unique Retriever solves the problem of staining formalin fixed tissues. This is an affordable solution to all known major problems with immunohistochemistry on paraffin sections. Ease of use combined with high reproducibility of the results will give you the best quality immunostaining.
The Retriever is
ideal for: Investigative Pathology, where the high quality of staining (a picture may be published!) is required.
E-cadherin (Membranous, extracellular domain) ...EMS has it!
CONTACT US FOR MORE INFORMATION...
Any lab that is short on technical personnel: any student or post- doc can process slides for the staining without using much time
Small routine pathology labs, where a limited number of slides should be processed daily
Anyone who uses highly valuable samples, such as tissue arrays or unique tissue samples: Simplicity and reliability of the unit ensures the safety of your sample, and a high quality antigen unmasking
Excellent epitope recovery. Always.
P.O. Box 550 • 1560 Industry Rd. Hatfield, Pa 19440 Tel: (215) 412-8400 Fax: (215) 412-8450 email:
sgkcck@aol.com or
stacie@ems-secure.com
OUR MAIN INTERACTIVE WEBSITE:
www.emsdiasum.com
TO REQUEST A COPY OF OUR CATALOG:
www.emsdiasum.com/ requests/catalog
TO VIEW OUR DIGITAL CATALOG:
catalog.emsdiasum.com without the Retriever with the Retriever
A proper epitope recovery may be critical for your conclusions on protein expression. The pictures above show staining for E-cadherin on human small intestine tissue without processing in Retriever (above left) and after the processing in Retriever (above right). One pathology lab from Belgium reported that they had up to 30% of false-negative staining for oestrogen receptor with microwave epitope recovery, and less than 2% after they switched to Retriever.
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48 |
Page 49 |
Page 50 |
Page 51 |
Page 52 |
Page 53 |
Page 54 |
Page 55 |
Page 56 |
Page 57 |
Page 58 |
Page 59 |
Page 60 |
Page 61 |
Page 62 |
Page 63 |
Page 64 |
Page 65 |
Page 66 |
Page 67 |
Page 68