search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Sheep


Plans to tackle dog attacks on livestock ‘could go further’


P


olice plans to seize dogs which attack livestock should go fur- ther, say livestock leaders. Stricter measures to crack down on sheep worrying were confirmed by the government last month. The new pro- posals will come into effect once the Kept Animals Bill has passed through parliament.


The National Sheep Associatio said it welcomed the strengthened legisla- tion. But it said the additional police powers to seize dogs should have been further backed up by a big increase in the maximum fines imposed. NSA chief executive Phil Stocker


said: “This was an opportunity to cre- ate a major deterrent to this antisocial behaviour by substantially increasing the maximum applicable fine alongside more proactive measures to prevent at- tacks occurring.”


‘Missing a trick’ Mr Stocker said Defra and other gov- ernment ministers responsible for Eng- lish legislation were “missing a trick” by failing to take the opportunity to in- crease fines in line with those imposed in Scotland.


Legislation which received royal asset earlier this year mean people who fail to keep close control of their dogs in Scotland face a year-long jail sentence, a fine of up to £40,000 – or possibly both.


But a person who commits a simi-


lar offence in England under the new animal welfare legislation is liable only to a summary conviction and a fine not exceeding Level 3 on the standard scale – currently £1000. Mr Stocker said the English bill was welcome but contained little that would reduce the number of dog attacks. “In fact, the lack of clarity in defining ‘un- der close control’ puts farmers and dog owners in a difficult, potentially con- flicting position.”


Recent reports of out-of-control dogs causing harm to livestock including a cow being chased over an embankment to its death; and an MP being fined for his dog chasing deer in Richmond Park, London. The rising number of incidents had come with increased dog ownership and


This was an opportunity for a major deterrent





more people using farmland for leisure, said Mr Stocker. The NSA’s own survey also revealed a concerning increase in dog attacks on sheep over the past year. These incidents all pointed to an urgent need for simple, straightfor- ward an effective measures to radical- ly reduce the number of cases, said Mr Stocker. It should be a legal require- ment for non-working dogs to be on a lead near livestock. Defra’s proposed legislation includes plans for a maximum five-year prison sentence and unlimited fines for animal cruelty. Mr Stocker said he looked for-


ward to working with Defra to improve responsible dog ownership.


The injury and stress involved when sheep and other livestock were attacked resulted in serious animal cruelty and should therefore be subject to similar maximum penalties and deterrents, he added.


While the NSA would like to see leg- islation strengthened beyond what ap- pears to be proposed it will also contin- ue to campaign to improve attitudes to responsible dog ownership, to pro- tect its members’ livelihoods and re- duce stress and anxiety.


Traumatic incidents ‘on the rise’


More than two thirds of the UK’s sheep farm- ers responding to a recent survey have expe- rienced an increase in sheep worrying attacks by dogs during the past year. The troubling statistic is part of a concern- ing set of findings released by the National Sheep Association (NSA) from its recent farm- er’s survey assessing the incidence and impact of sheep worrying by dog attacks. The NSA received a record-breaking re- sponse for its 2021 survey specifically aimed at farmers who had experienced dog attacks in the past year. The increase in contributions in- dicates the scale of the serious problem. On average, each respondent to the survey experienced seven cases of sheep worrying dur- ing the past year. Each attack typically resulted


in five sheep being injured and two sheep killed. Estimated financial losses through inci- dents of sheep worrying of up to £50,000 were recorded, with an average across all respond- ents of £1570. But most respondents received no or very little compensation.


But in addition to the threat to animal wel- fare and the farmer’s income perhaps the most concerning finding to be taken from the survey is the effect the issue is having on the mental wellbeing of sheep farmers. Farmers completing the survey reported feelings of anxiety, anger, upset, stress and frustration as a result of sheep worrying by dog attacks with more than half recognising that this was causing a moderate to severe im- pact on their mental health.


JULY 2021 • MIDLAND FARMER 35 More dog owners are walking in the countryside


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48