search.noResults

search.searching

saml.title
dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
Arable How aphid monitoring keeps


growers on top of BYDV • Forecasts risk of BYDV spreading • System is simple but very eff ective • Helps to reduce insecticide usage


F


armer-led aphid monitoring could help reduce the use of in- secticides to tackle barley yellow


dwarf virus (BYDV) in cereals. A simple fi eld-based monitoring system – run by farmers – could help combat BYDV following the 2019 ne- onicotinoid ban, according to the study by the Game & Wildlife Conservation Trust (GWCT). A potentially devastating disease,


BYDV can reduce yields by 30% in wheat and 75% in barley. Yields are most affected by autumn infestations of virus carrying aphids fl ying into ce- real crops.


Pyrethroid insecticides used as an alternative to neonicotinoids are tox- ic to the benefi cial insects in the crop. They also have the potential to con- taminate waterways where they are highly toxic to aquatic insects.


Monitoring method Funded by the Agriculture and Horti- culture Development Board (AHDB), the study shows that fi eld-based moni- toring to count aphid numbers can pre- dict the risk of BYDV transmitted by cereal aphids in the autumn. It also showed that better under- standing of aphid infestations im- proves both the targeting and the tim- ing of insecticide applications. This reduces spray usage because aphids are controlled before they have a chance to spread within the crop.


Researchers tested the practicali-


ty of fi eld-based monitoring by equip- ping seven farmers and agronomists with yellow sticky traps – 20cm² cards coated with wet-stick mounted hori- zontally just above the crop.


Simple approach Yellow is known to be attractive to aphids. The farmers and agrono- mists were asked to trial the traps for a month, changing them every week. They were given a simple guide to as- sess aphid numbers. John Holland, head of the GWCT’s farmland ecology unit, said: “The par- ticipants liked the simplicity of the ap- proach and would be willing to use it, but wanted better training in aphid identifi cation in future.”


Traps were deployed in the head- lands and middle of different fi elds so researchers could examine wheth- er landscape composition, boundary type and tillage methods affect aphid immigration into crops.


Determined aphids “We found at least three times as many fl ying aphids in the headland area com- pared with the fi eld centre in both stud- ies, and especially next to tall bound- aries, indicating that wind currents determined aphid immigration pat- terns within fi elds.”


The scientists found that the type of tillage had no impact on levels of aphid


It improves the targeting and timing applications


“ JH Vaudrey & Son Ltd


BYDV can reduce yields by 30% in wheat and 75% in barley.


immigration. By studying a range of landscapes, they found more aphids where there was a higher proportion of grassland with a 1km radius of the sampled fi eld. “We found considerable variation in aphid numbers between fi elds (24% had none), even on the same farm, which confi rms the merits of fi eld- based monitoring to reduce insecti- cide use.”


Grain storage and handling Steel framed buildings Groundworks All types of concrete Turnkey projects


Phone: 01379 678459 Email: info@jhvaudrey.co.uk www.jhvaudrey.co.uk


10 ANGLIA FARMER • JULY 2021


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76