www.bifa.org
Legal Eagle
misrepresentations claims could be brought under the Misrepresentation Act 1967 or via the tort of negligent misstatement. Particular concerns arise if bills are switched in order to: – Hide the place the cargo was loaded (which may be an attempt to avoid import duty on the cargo, or circumvent a sanctions regime).
– Amend the date of shipment (which may be to avoid problems in the sale contract with letter of credit terms where bills of lading must be issued within certain dates of loading).
Who can request switch bills? The owner of the goods (ie the holder of the first bills) at the time of the request.
What are the risks associated with switch bills? Switching bills of lading is not prohibited as a matter of English law, provided there is no fraudulent purpose behind the request. However, the practice potentially exposes the carrier to risks such as: 1. Theft and misdelivery claims Issuing switch bills of lading risks there being multiple bills of lading in circulation for the same cargo, in which case the carrier could face a claim in misdelivery for the value of the cargo covered by the bill(s). For example, a fraudulent shipper may sell the goods to two consignees, facilitated by the issuance of a second bill. If the first set is not cancelled and surrendered, both consignees may present bills of lading purportedly entitling them to delivery, putting the carrier in a very difficult (and potentially very costly) position.
2.Claims in deceit/misrepresentation A false or negligent representation in switch bills could expose the carrier. In the case of intentional deception or fraud, a claim could be brought under the tort of deceit and in the case of negligence or innocent
3.Prejudiced insurance cover Some P&I insurers exclude cover for liability arising from or under switch bills. Cover may be refused for cargo claims or, in the case of fines and loss, due to custom laws infringements. Often a letter of indemnity (LOI) is requested by the carrier from the person requesting the second bill. An LOI issued to facilitate an unlawful purpose will not be enforceable.
4.Other issues The applicable international convention may be altered by issuing a switch bill. For example, a Hague-Visby Rules bill of lading could become subject to the Hague Rules by the insertion of different terms or depending on how, where and by whom the new switch bill is issued. Letters of credit could be declined in the case of discrepancies.
Minimising the risks Certain considerations will always apply when the parties request a bill of lading to be switched or amended: 1. Ask why the switch is being done; simple due diligence may flush out any untoward practice. Beware of any evasive answers and indicators of fraud.
2. Consider whether the process of switching the bills of lading may amend, vary or replace the contract of carriage. Particular care must be given to the charter party and other terms incorporated into the original and switch bills.
3. Consider whether any feature of the proposed switch bill of lading will mislead a third party about the representations in the
Support your local Member group
BIFA utilises a network of Regional Consultants around the UK to act as a conduit for the dissemination of information and to
July 2020
seek local Member views on topics of interest. In light of current restrictions due to the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic, regional activity
bills that are being changed.
4. The first set of bills of lading should be surrendered and cancelled before releasing the switch bill. This is the only way the carrier is able to confirm that all the parties to the carriage consent to the switch, and that the requestor is the true owner of the cargo. Surrender and cancellation will also reduce the risk of misdelivery claims.
5. Seek the consent of the relevant parties to the contract of carriage (the carrier and the holder of the bills).
6. Consult insurers as to whether the switch bill of lading, in the circumstances, will prejudice cover.
7. If an LOI is offered in return for switching bills of lading, the carrier must consider whether the LOI will be enforceable. This includes whether the requestor has sufficient assets against which to enforce; how well the requestor knows the entity offering the LOI; how often the parties have done business together before; and, whether the requestor can be ‘trusted’.
8. The use of electronic bills of lading. These can be mutably stored in, for example, a centralised digitalised system using blockchain, helping to decrease document exchange and enabling carriers to track bills of lading in real time. Such systems may reduce the risks associated with switch bills of lading outlined above. However, any idiosyncratic risks involved in the use of electronic bills of lading are not considered in this brief article.
Conclusion Whilst it is not uncommon in practice for switch bills to be requested for valid and honest commercial reasons, as Longmore J said in The Atlas [1996] 1 Lloyd’s Rep. 642, issuing such bills is a practice fraught with danger. A carrier opens itself to potential claims for which insurance cover may be refused. Before issuing switch bills, it is crucial for a carrier to insist upon surrender of the first set of bills, to ensure all parties to the ‘bill of lading contract’ consent, and obtain guidance from insurers, in particular P&I insurers.
For further guidance or questions on this topic, please contact Thomas Miller Law's Plymouth office.
BIFAlink
has moved online. For details of forthcoming meetings in your
region see
www.bifa.org/ events?tag=Regional or contact the appropriate Regional Consultant (details on page 3 of this issue).
21
Courtesy of the Port of Felixstowe
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24
