search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
OCTOBER 2019 • COUNTRY LIFE IN BC


BC considers making premises


ID mandatory Provincial coordinator counters fears regarding privacy issues


by MARGARET EVANS VICTORIA—Since 2011, the


BC Ministry of Agriculture has run a voluntary premises identification program for farm owners to voluntarily register their property and animals. Registration helps to


protect animal health and facilitates a rapid response in the event of emergencies. Anyone from hobby farmers with one or two animals to large commercial livestock operators can register. “Premises ID deals


exclusively with the premises and where they are – the farm, the feedlot, whatever the case may be,” explains Lisa Levesque, team lead, traceability and premises identification with the BC Ministry of Agriculture. Approximately 57% of


premises have been registered since the program started, but the ministry is considering a new premises ID regulation under the BC Animal Health Act. The regulation would make registration mandatory for all farms and livestock sites. Those sites include not only farms but stables, feedlots, apiaries, livestock markets, abattoirs, fairgrounds, or any facility where farm animals are present, raised, kept or disposed.


The purpose is to increase


the precise tracking of any disease outbreak or any environmental emergency. During the 2017 wildfires, the premises ID program saw 130 emergency registrations for livestock owners affected by evacuation orders, improving their chances of being given re-entry permits in evacuation zones to care for their livestock.


This past summer, the


ministry has been doing some outreach for feedback but there’s plenty of confusion regarding the intent of the regulation.


The plan is to identify


premises only. It does not include the need to identify animals through the use of tags, tattoos or any other tracking device, explains Levesque, emphasizing that the program is exclusively for premises. “We are just tackling the


physical location which helps us to make maps of animal


countrylifeinbc.com


WEEKLY FARM


NEWS UPDATES


Sign up for FREE today. FARM NEWS 8:15am-12:45pm


For more information contact: Liz Robertson, CAFA Executive Director lrobertson@cafanet.ca 877-474-2871


www.cafanet.ca  @CAFAnet


locations which we only use internally for emergency,” she says. “Animal identification such as tagging or tattooing is a federal responsibility, so it’s managed by the CFIA [Canadian Food Inspection Agency].”


Pushback Levesque recognizes that


there is some pushback from farm owners not wanting government involved in their businesses. Some landowners feel privacy is at stake, especially if they are small operators with just a few animals. They may not see the relevance or value of being in a government registry where data might float around and become available to others. Levesque, however, emphasizes that no information is shared with other government agencies or researchers. The focus is on disease and environmental emergency response. “If you have one animal or


50, if you get a communicable disease on your farm, it is still an issue and you can still transfer that,” she says, giving the example of African swine fever. “It has not made it to Canada. But from a risk perspective, if you have only one pig and it is exposed to a virulent disease, that one pig can be the trigger. Animal diseases have no boundaries and it’s not about us wanting to control the farming business, but we do want to be able to respond quickly to an emergency issue.” An example would be the


avian influenza outbreak that occurred in 2004 when there was a lack of accurate information on where chickens were actually being raised compared to the contact location. The outbreak


YOUR Helping You


ou


3


Bin there, done that


Scenic Road Cider Co. owner Taylor Sebastian fills a bin with his first Galas of the season. Sebastian sends his apples to the De Simone packinghouse and says the fruit is looking good despite some hail damage. Cull apples will go into the four varieties of apple cider he makes, which is sold throughout BC. MYRNA STARK LEADER PHOTO


was devastating. Many poultry farmers subsequently signed onto the premises ID concept, registering voluntarily. When the 2014- 2015 outbreak happened, the program played a role in limiting the spread of the disease.


IMPR O V ING


Levesque said that other examples include water contamination and flooding events, wildfires such as those in 2017 and 2018, and bovine tuberculosis. “Those are all cases where


premises ID was used. It’s not used a lot, but the information


TH E QU A L ITY OF


was very important for those situations,” she says. The ministry is running a


survey until October 11 regarding the proposed regulation. A discussion paper regarding the proposal and the survey can be found at [http://bit.do/Premises-ID].


F A R M A D V I CE


CAFA®


are valued and trusted


advisors to farm families and farm businesses


Farm Business


Sustainability - Future Proof the Family Farm


Tuesday, October 8, 2019 Bradner Hall, Abbotsford


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48