search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
14 COMMENT


Dr Richard Coulton, CEO at Siltbuster


TREATING WATER POLLUTION ON CONSTRUCTION SITES


Dr Richard Coulton of Siltbuster outlines the main types of on-site water pollution, and how to treat them.


discharge anything off site other than clean water need a Bespoke Discharge Permit from the Environment Agency.


U


This comes in the context of the Environment Agency recently prosecuting a Leeds-based house building company £120,000 for illegally polluting a watercourse, by not controlling silty run-off.


It should be noted that the new sentencing guidelines remove any economic benefit derived by committing the offence, always making it cheaper to prevent the pollution incident. “It should not be cheaper to offend than to take appropriate precautions” Judge Francis Sheridan said at the trial of Thames Water, fining them £20m for polluting the river. Furthermore, all companies – even those that


ALL COMPANIES MUST HAVE A PLAN FOR MANAGING WATER IN PLACE PRIOR TO STARTING ANY WORK


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


don’t need such a permit – must have a site water management plan in place prior to starting any work. That plan needs to show how they will minimise and deal with any problem waters generated during the construction process. The most common sources of onsite water pollution are silty waters, oil and concrete wash water.


SILTY WATER


Around 40 per cent of construction industry water pollution involves silt-laden water run-off. When a construction site strips the topsoil, it takes away the land’s strongest defence against erosion, vegetation. The resultant surface has no protection from rainfall and run-off, so silty water enters drains and watercourses, potentially blocking the gills of fish and smothering aquatic life.


If silty water does arise it needs dealing with – and with expensive tankering costs, people must master on-site treatment techniques. Lagoons or settlement tanks are possible solutions – but these take up a lot of space. The smarter option is using lamella clarifiers, which


nder the Environment Agency’s Regulatory Policy Statement (RPS), construction companies likely to


are up to 20 times more space efficient. They use gravity to settle the particles out of the silty water, making it safe to then be released. If the waters have very fine slow settling particles, such as clays, a chemical dosing stage can be added to aggregate the particles and increase settling rates.


OIL


Hydrocarbons are commonly encountered on construction sites in the form of petroleum- based substances such as petrol, diesel, kerosene and oils. To minimise this pollution, oil spill kits and refuelling vehicles can be provided in desig- nated areas. However, in certain cases, such as remediation of contaminated sites, oil polluted water may be hard to avoid. In such cases an oil water separator will be needed to remove free floating oil and light non-aqueous phase liquids from water through separation by flotation.


CONCRETE WASH WATER


On a volume by volume basis concrete wash water has the potential to cause much harm as it can’t be easily diluted. This is because the pH of concrete wash water is incredibly high – typically 12 to 13, which is the equivalent of oven cleaner.


This highly polluting water needs to have its suspended solids removed and its pH reduced to an acceptable value. The solids removal is relatively straight forward, however choosing the best pH adjustment method is less clear-cut. Dilution isn’t practical or cost effective, while mineral acids are dangerous to handle and can easily overshoot the target resulting in acidic water. Citric acid is also easy to overdose, and it increases the water’s ‘biochemical oxygen demand’ above acceptable limits.


Carbon dioxide is by far the best neutralising agent. It’s virtually impossible to acidify water


using CO2, it has no hazardous by-products, is easy to store and is the most cost-effective.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52