search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
2 CLOSED sessions not sitting well with Opposition


and locations of the meetings are not advertised. “We have a list of every


local government in the province and every farm organization that we are aware of – every farmers’ institute, you name it – everybody’s getting an invitation,” committee chair Jennifer Dyson told Country Life in BC. Well, not quite everyone.


Groups with an interest in farming but not linked to production agriculture are excluded. “We’ve had some groups


that are food security groups, and we think food security is great, but they’re not necessarily the stakeholder that we’re meeting with,” Dyson says. Nevertheless, the BC Food


Systems Network, which "works to create healthy, just and sustainable food systems" presented.


The general public,


meanwhile, are welcome to comment via the online survey set up to garner feedback, or a written submission. “We’ve had a lot of MLAs wanting to attend and we’ve


INCREASE CROP YIELDS


LASER LEVELLING LTD.


TRI-WAY FARMS


We service all of Southern BC


IMPROVED DRAINAGE


UNIFORM GERMINATION


UNIFORM IRRIGATION


FAST,


ACCURATE SURVEYING


CALL FOR AN ESTIMATE LARRY


604.209.5523 TROY


604.209.5524


said, ‘Thank you for your interest, but this is a stakeholder meeting,’” Dyson says.


Concerning


That’s not sitting well with Opposition agriculture critic Ian Paton, the BC Liberal MLA for Delta South, who previously criticized the lack of representation from commercial farmers on the review committee. The inability of the general farm population, let alone farm landowners, to address the committee directly concerns him. “It’s definitely a concern


that [BC] agriculture minister Lana Popham won’t allow members of the public to make face-to-face submissions to her committee,” he says. “If the true intention of this committee is to protect farmers and farmland, why is she putting so many restrictions on who can give input, and how they can do so?”


During consultations for


the BC Agriculture Plan in 2006, open houses were held across the province that attracted a broad spectrum of speakers. Similarly, when Popham led the Opposition Standing Committee for Agriculture and Food on a tour of the province in 2015, she said it was an opportunity for farmers to give feedback that government might not always want to hear. “Giving the agriculture community a chance to be heard is dangerous for government, because then you actually need to hear the facts,” Popham said at the time. “They’re so thankful that there’s an opportunity to have a committee like that.”


Paton says the limitations on who can meet with the current committee suggest that the government has made up its mind on issues such as whether or not to return to a single-zone ALR. “The minister has publicly stated that she sees that change coming, in the same breath that she promises to consult in a meaningful way,” he says. “In my view, genuine consultation involves speaking face-to-face with the people who will be most affected by one’s decisions. It’s my hope that Minister Popham will re-think her consultation strategy and give actual farmers, ranchers and producers the opportunity to face her directly with their ideas.”


Independent committee


However, Popham says that the committee has full independence and made the call on how to structure the engagement process itself. “When I chose the committee members, it was made very clear that they’re independent of me, so they’ve made that decision themselves,” she says. “They’re a volunteer committee, and they’ve basically put into their schedule how many places they can meet and how much time they have to spend to come up with a report for me with these very, very serious recommendations by the end of the summer.” Popham says she’s received


“an enormous amount of positive feedback,” adding, “everybody’s invited to give their input online 24 hours a day till the end of April, so nobody’s left out of the process at all.” Dyson agrees, noting that participation in the


NEW REPLACEMENT PARTS for MOST TRACTORS & FARM IMPLEMENTS


WANTED! JOHN DEERE CAB 4X4 LDR TRACTOR, 80-100 HP


JOHN DEERE 6150M , OPEN STATION LOADER, 4X4, 20/20 TRANS, 150 HP., 700 HRS., EXCELLENT CONDITION ........................................ 118,000 JOHN DEERE 6400 4WD CAB LOADER TRACTOR. 12000 HRS............ 42,000 JOHN DEERE 6415 4WD CAB LOADER TRACTOR. 4000 HRS.............. 65,000 JOHN DEERE 4240 2WD CAB TRACTOR, TURBO................................. 20,000 JOHN DEERE 3140 2WD OPEN STATION LOADER TRACTOR............. 16,500 JOHN DEERE 4230 CAB TRACTOR, 100 PTO HP, NEWER ENGINE ......19,500 DRAGLINE MANURE APPLICATOR W/4" FLAT HOSE, REEL INCL. .. 25,000


MF 265 2WD, CAB, LOADER, 3,000 HRS, GOOD CONDITION .......... 10,500 JOHN DEERE 510 2WD LOADER TRACTOR, 40 HP, 540-1000 PTO................................................................................. 7,500


MECHANICS SPECIAL, MF 184-4 LOADER TRACTOR & INTERNATIONAL 454 LDR TRACTOR | CALL FOR DETAILS


Tractor/Equipment Repair Mobile Service Available We accept Interact, Visa and Mastercard


www.tractorparts4sale.ca ABBOTSFORD, BC


Bus. 604/807-2391 Fax. 604/854-6708 email: sales@tractorparts4sale.ca GD Repair Ltd


stakeholder meetings and online has been positive. “People are extremely well


prepared to speak,” she says. “We’ve had young people desperate for access to land. We’ve had an incredible mix of individuals.”


Online submissions have


numbered in the hundreds, Dyson says, something she considers “phenomenal.” The leading concerns in the


feedback received till mid- February were house size on farm properties, and cannabis production. Many local government representatives also pointed to the challenge a general ignorance of agriculture poses. She expects a diversity of opinions as the committee moves across the province, especially given the lack of consensus farm organizations are voicing regarding the ALR. “There’s no unanimity


around the farm organizations themselves in terms of what we hear. It’s just


COUNTRY LIFE IN BC • MARCH 2018 nfrom page 1


all over the map,” she says, noting that local governments have been more uniform in their concerns and advocacy for agriculture. “As our provincial


government does less and less and less and less and less in agriculture, the local governments have picked up more,” she says. “They’re putting on events in their communities; they’re trying to support agriculture. That has picked up where farm organizations have left off.” Stakeholder meetings are scheduled for dates through March 14, with further dates to be set. Participation in the online survey and written submissions will be accepted through April 30 at 4 pm. For more details, visit [https://engage.gov.bc.ca/agri culturallandreserve/ways-to- participate]. The review committee’s


report and recommendations to government will be delivered in fall 2018.


Points for review VICTORIA – The nine-member committee BC


agriculture minister Lana Popham appointed in January to review the Agricultural Land Commission and Agricultural Land Reserve (ALR) has three general objectives: preserving the productive capacity of land in the ALR; encouraging agriculture and food production in the ALR; and strengthening the administration and governance of the ALR and ALC “to both increase public confidence and to ensure that land use regulation and land use decisions are preserving agricultural land and encouraging farming and ranching in the ALR.” The discussion paper that forms the basis of the


province-wide consultation focuses on 10 key themes: • A defensible and defended ALR • ALR resilience • Stable governance • Efficacy of zones 1 and 2 • Interpretation and implementation of the Act and regulation


• Food security and BC’s agricultural contribution • Residential uses in the ALR • Farm processing and sales in the ALR • Unauthorized uses • Non-Farm uses and resource extraction in the ALR The online survey created to gather feedback from the general public asks questions related to the themes and provides room for participants to comment on each, to a limit of 600 characters. The survey is open to participation until April 30 at 4 pm.


—Peter Mitham


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52