search.noResults

search.searching

dataCollection.invalidEmail
note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
42 HEATING & RENEWABLES GOING OFF-GRID


Ian Digby of Calor discusses looks at how alterations to standard housing designs resulting from fuel choice can be reduced for off-grid properties, and the part played by Part L1A of the Building Regulations.


dwellings’) is one of the more challenging aspects of modern housebuilding. Because of these challenges, developers have spent a large amount of time and effort in recent years perfecting their standard house type range to deliver compliance in the most cost-effective fashion.


C


It is estimated that five per cent of new dwellings built each year are unable to connect to the mains gas supply. There are a range of alternative fuel options available to housebuilders – including liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) and oil and air source heat pumps (ASHPs). However, the choice of fuel source can have a significant impact on house designs.


OPTING FOR OIL Traditionally, rural housebuilders would have considered oil heating as the default option for developments beyond the mains gas grid. However, in recent years the number of modifications required to a property heated by oil for it to pass Part L1A have made this an expensive option.


Firstly, because of the high CO2 emissions of oil in comparison to mains gas, the required changes in the fabric of the building (to reduce the amount of fuel used) means it is very difficult to achieve compliance without installing a significant amount of solar PV panels. The available roof space on smaller properties is often an issue, and in addition, the need to make these roofs south-facing to generate the required amount of electricity makes matters more complex. This, coupled with the higher price of the oil boiler itself and the need to modify standard internal layouts to accommodate the larger floor-mounted or external boiler, have led to the majority of housebuilders discounting oil as an option.


HIDDEN COSTS In more recent years, rural housebuilders have moved to air source heat pumps (ASHPs) as an alternative. However, while


WWW.HBDONLINE.CO.UK


omplying with Part L1A of the Building Regulations (‘conservation of fuel and power in new


there is usually no need to alter the base fabric specification of a property with an ASHP, there are a range of additional opera- tional costs to take into account. To deliver the best efficiency levels, ASHPs work best at low temperatures, delivering hot water at 35 degrees. To compensate for these low flow tempera- tures, most installations will require underfloor heating or larger-than-standard radiators to heat the property, which again, is a major, costly deviation from the standard housing design layout. An ASHP is unable to deliver instanta- neous hot water in the same way that a gas combination boiler can for properties of up to four bedrooms, and as such, will always


require a hot water cylinder to be installed into the property. This will likely impact on bedroom space, as an associated cylinder cupboard needs to be fitted. An ASHP will also require a large exter- nal pump, in the style of an air conditioning unit, to be located near the home – almost always attached to the property in the rear garden, detracting from the overall site aesthetics.


It is important for developers to remem- ber that an ASHP uses technology that new home buyers may not be familiar with, and that there are significant operational differ- ences over a gas boiler. An ASHP is designed to maintain house temperature at a constant level, as opposed to a gas boiler, which will quickly bring a house up to temperature on request.


This means new occupiers may struggle to operate the heating system as efficiently as possible, leading to after-sales issues for housebuilders and buyer dissatisfaction. In addition, due to the significant electricity requirements of a new estate built with ASHPs, it may be a requirement for the developer to cover the cost of upgrading the electric supply to the site, which could include the requirement for a new sub-station. However, the major drawback to house- builders of ASHPs is the equipment costs – with a heat pump costing around £3,500 - £4,000 per house. Coupled with the factors


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52