The obstacles to getting fire safety right, post-Grenfell

James Butler of Pura Facades expresses his concern that despite the best intentions of the final Hackitt report following the Grenfell disaster, the fragmented nature of the industry could mean there are implementation challenges ahead


he long-awaited final report from Dame Judith Hackitt could bring about fundamental changes to the way architects consider the risks associated with design and the use of building materials. Clearly, the UK’s construction industry is not in a great place right now. Officially the sector is in recession; the collapse of Carillion was a body blow to the industry, and Grenfell continues to cast a long shadow over the whole market. With such low credibility right now, the outcome of the final Hackitt Report, due imminently, is vital. Not only do we need clear and robust recommendations, but also an appropriate response from architects, specifiers, contractors and safety organisations. And though Grenfell will leave a permanent scar, there’s now a perceptible willingness to learn and adapt so a similar catastrophe could never happen again. Since the dreadful events of 14 June 2017, architects and specifiers have had little guidance or clarity on fire safety with regards to cladding systems. Data suggests that the industry has become much more risk averse, using A2 or above fire retardant materials wherever possible. However, independent, clear guidance on which products conform to which fire rating standards has been complex and opaque for many specifiers. Last year, we produced a comprehensive Fire Rating Guide, offering independent advice on fire-rated cladding systems. Choosing an approved cladding system shouldn’t need to be so reliant on the customer doing their own research. There is also strong anecdotal evidence to suggest that major suppliers to the cladding market are dropping non-tested components from their range, as demonstrated by Vivalda Group’s recent decision to supply only A2 rated aluminium composite product on projects over 18 metres in height. There are signs that there has been a rush to fire test products – with the likes of BBA and WinTech reporting full order books for their services over the past few months.


The post-Grenfell period has led to much more open consultation within the industry which has led to architects and suppliers reaching out to build relationships with highly regarded testing organisations. Such engagement, albeit informal at this stage, is a good sign that the industry at large sees a need for more joined up thinking where cladding performance and safety is concerned.

As well as clear and robust regulations, the industry also wants to see strong and consistent enforcement from the Hackitt Report. However, as is often the case, the devil will be in the detail. The complex, inevitably fragmented nature of cladding systems deserves specific attention. The regulations need to cover more than simply the panels. Attention needs to be given to complete cladding systems, including fixings, sub-frames and insulation. Systems are by their very nature not simple to regulate, given the hundreds of manufacturers that are potentially involved. While widespread and comprehensive testing of all parts that make up cladding systems should be part of the solution, so should clarity and access to information for specifiers. We need to make safety paramount but also not onerous for those involved in recommending the right solution. Retrospective testing is another potential area of concern, given the fact that 149 high rise buildings in the UK failed fire safety tests following Grenfell. Once the Hackitt report is published and a clear safety standard is made public, how will cash strapped councils afford such fundamental renovation work? How quickly should the work be done? And who will be responsible for checking the quality of the retro-fitted cladding? These are all questions that need to be answered as part of the report, which needs to take a detailed, holistic approach to regulations and safety.

James Butler is the director of Pura Facades WWW.ARCHITECTSDATAFILE.CO.UK


BEST PRACTICE Working closely with main contractor Bouygues, Pura supplied Rieder GRC (glassfibre reinforced concrete) panels as a lightweight alternative to pre-cast or GRC concrete facades for Hallsville Quarter, Canning Town

Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84