DECEMBER 2017 • COUNTRY LIFE IN BC Trade negotiations creating uncertainty
Foreigners view Canada’s supply-managed dairy industry as the “golden goose” There’s no question that
pressure is mounting on the Canadian government to grant increased market access to US dairy interests
imports. As a “golden goose”
Viewpoint by Trevor Hargreaves
amidst NAFTA negotiations. With ongoing overproduction hurting prices in US dairy markets, this would be a sizeable domestic win for both the US industry and an aggressive Trump administration. President Trump promised Canadian market access to US dairy farmers during his somewhat factually challenged announcement from a Wisconsin podium back in April, and this will be a major sticking point in NAFTA’s renewal negotiations. Trade pressures have been a common theme for the Canadian dairy industry in recent years. The pressure was mounting during the Comprehensive European Trade Agreement (CETA) negotiations two years ago, and tensions were equally high during the failed Trans- Pacific Partnership (TPP) talks last year. As the industry now eyes potential NAFTA market concessions, the Canadian dairy sector is in the midst of adapting to the roll-out of sizeable new foreign-cheese market access granted as a last-minute trade concession by the Harper government to get CETA signed.
Government support
As I see it, the challenge for supply management and the dairy industry moving forward isn’t that it doesn’t have government support. It does. Supply management is strongly supported at both the provincial and federal level. In a brief conversation on the subject about five months ago with Prime Minister Trudeau, he said to me directly, “I’m a big supporter of supply management and intend to strongly defend it.” The real challenge for supply-managed sectors – and particularly Canadian dairy – is that they represent a golden goose to foreign agricultural markets. The great fallacy of global trade agreements is the notion that these deals are bringing new products to new markets. In reality, far more often than not, these deals mean a segment of a given domestic market is disrupted by new, competitively priced foreign
industry, dairy is a lucrative win whenever market concessions are granted, as Canadian dairy is unfairly perceived as a “closed market.” This is
nonsensical
based on the fact that Canada imports five times more US dairy than we export to the US. Yet this market perspective artificially escalates the importance of dairy amidst any ongoing trade discussions regardless of the specific agreement, be it CETA, TPP, NAFTA or what- have-you. There’s no debating the
fact that foreign dairy markets in the US, New Zealand and Europe are outwardly struggling amidst low milk prices, over- production, declining market trends, declining subsidization rates and
crowded export opportunities. To them, Canada is the great hope at turning around a failing bottom line. If they’re explorers, we’re their Eldorado. That prosperity they’re
after, however, is ours. Dairy is a local community
industry. The employment and profits flow directly back into agricultural regions and our collective GDP and tax contributions are both sizeable and stable. Domestic dairy prosperity is ours as Canadians, and it’s precisely what we stand to lose every time the Canadian dairy market is eroded with new market concessions.
Cheese sliced
Let’s look at this historically, just setting our view back a few years. A sizeable piece of the Canadian cheese market was granted two years ago under CETA (16,700 tonnes). Additional dairy market access was on the table for
TPP (3.25%), and while the original deal failed, it’s now being resurrected as TPP11 (minus US participation). In addition, the industry faces the risk of additional market concessions under NAFTA in coming weeks and months. Now, I want you to put
yourself in the shoes of a BC dairy farmer. Canadian governments may support supply-managed sectors in theory, but if you combine the ongoing string of trade concessions, the market is rapidly being eroded for the benefit of other sectors. While trade agreements (at least in theory) support our domestic economy, they’re an outward negative for Canadian dairy. In this province, dairy quota and land have the highest values in Canada, raising the cost of production. How can we as a province and, indeed, a nation, expect the next generation of dairy farmers to confidently assume ever- escalating financial
obligations (and succession plan agreements from their
From everyone at Country Life in BC, may the spirit of the holiday season be yours now & in the new year!
parents), when piece after piece of the industry is being handed to foreign interests? In the US, dairy production
is heavily subsidized by the US Farm Bill. In Canada, however, it’s not. It’s not an “apples to apples” comparison, and when a piece of the Canadian dairy market is given away, what’s really being handed off is the investment of generations of Canadian farmers. Amidst a global dairy
industry downturn, only one Western dairy-market is really prospering: Canada’s. Foreign Affairs minister
Chrystia Freeland once said that Canada must “set our own clear and sovereign course” amidst NAFTA negotiations. A big part of that course, as I see it, is more rigidly defending Canadian dairy, not only in NAFTA today but the trade deals of tomorrow. Trevor Hargreaves is director of producer relations and communications at the BC Dairy Association.
5
columnists Bob Collins Margaret Evans Judie Steeves Linda Wegner
contributors Emily Bulmer Cam Fortems Terry Fries
Gina Haambuckers Franya Jedwab Barbara Johnstone Grimmer
Naomi McGeachy Sean McIntyre Susan McIver
Ronda Payne Joe Sleigh Jennifer Smith
Myrna Stark Leader Tom Walker Chris Yates
graphics Tina Rezansoff
CATHY GLOVER publisher & editor
DAVID SCHMIDT editor emeritus
PETER MITHAM associate editor
TAMARA LEIGH contributing editor
PHOTO BY NAOMI MCGEACHY | SWEET IRON PHOTOGRAPHY
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48