search.noResults

search.searching

note.createNoteMessage

search.noResults

search.searching

orderForm.title

orderForm.productCode
orderForm.description
orderForm.quantity
orderForm.itemPrice
orderForm.price
orderForm.totalPrice
orderForm.deliveryDetails.billingAddress
orderForm.deliveryDetails.deliveryAddress
orderForm.noItems
ESTIMATING A SMALL CRAFT’S STABILITY BY MEANS OF


BY JEFFREY CASCIANI-WOOD HONFIIMS ROLLING PERIOD TESTS


“The metacentric height is the lever by which the sea rocks the ship.” Kenneth Barnaby


When carrying out the survey of small craft for whatever reason, the marine surveyor must always bear in mind that, among the many factors that determine whether or not she is seaworthy is an adequate metacentric stability. To determine that accurately requires a full inclining experiment and a considerable amount of detail about the vessel’s hull form that is generally not available at a pre-purchase or similar stability. This method described here gives a simple rule of thumb by which a marine surveyor may make a sufficiently adequate guesstimate of the vessel’s stability from which he may make a decision as to whether or not he should recommend an inclining experiment. The evaluation of a number of inclining and rolling tests according to various formulae shows that the following gives the best results and that it has the advantage of being the simplest:


GMo where BWL


GMo TR


kRP The factor kRP


= = = =


waterline breadth


initial metacentric height rolling period


m m s


constant (the rolling coefficient) - is of the greatest importance (it’s about 1.25 for a narrowboat)


and it should be noted that the greater the distance of masses from the rolling axis, the greater the rolling coefficient will be. Therefore, it can be expected that:


• the rolling coefficient for an unloaded vessel (i.e. for a hollow body) will be higher than that for a loaded vessel.


• the rolling coefficient for a vessel carrying a great amount of bunkers and ballast both groups are usually located in the bottom (i.e. far away from the rolling axis) will be higher than that of the same vessel having empty fuel and ballast tanks.


44 | The Report • March 2018 • Issue 83 ≈ (kRP BWL /TR )2 m (1)


• the rolling periods observed may not be free oscillations but forced oscillations due to seaway.


• frequently, oscillations are either irregular or only regular for too short an interval of time to allow accurate measurements to be observed.


• specialized recording equipment is necessary.


However, sometimes it may be desirable to use the vessel’s period of roll as a means of approximately judging the stability at sea. If that is done, care should be taken to discard readings which depart appreciably from the majority


Experiments have shown that the results of the rolling test method get increasingly less reliable the nearer they approach metacentric height values of 0.2 m and below.


For the following reasons, it is not generally recommended that results be obtained from rolling oscillations taken in a seaway:


• exact coefficients for tests in open waters are not available.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76