Table 1: Design comparisons for restricted length and draft for the four containment systems
Particulars LBP (m)
with significant design improvement opportunities. Starting from 2005, the HyperWorks suite of advanced structural design,
Beam (m) Depth (m) Draft (m)
Displacement (t) Lightship (t)
analysis and
optimisation tools were used to improve the design to meet the structural objectives which could not otherwise be attained by the proposed original design. An earlier paper RAMOO, 2009 describes the finite element analysis and optimisation of the CDTS as applied for LNG applications. The design tools (software) used included:
• Op t imi s a t ion Te chniques: Topology Optimisation, Free-Size
• RADIOSS Non Linear Transient Dynamic Analyses for ALE & SPH
• AcuSolve CFD Analyses for Fluid & Heat Transfer analyses
analyses to predict sloshing loads
• HyperStudy (MDO) was used to develop the thermal management
Figure 4: CDTS 210,000m3
Op t imi s a t ion, Size/Ga g e Optimisation
Deadweight (t)
Deadweight Coefficient Cargo Capacity (m3
)
Relative capacity to membrane
Relative capacity to spherical Relative capacity to SPB SHP (kW)
SHP/Capacity
Spherical 285 49
25.9 12
123,090 36,774 86,316 0.701
155,000 86
100 86
30,418 0.196
Membrane 285 47
27.4 12
126,758 34,610 92,148 0.727
170,000 100
116 100
30,771 0.181
IHI SPB 285 49.5 32 12
135,468 41,590 93,878 0.693
170,000 100
119 100
34.206 0.201
CDTS 285 49 28 12
148,881 44,895
103,996 0.699
210,000 124
135 128
32,896 0.157
strategy such as position, locations, and volume of LNG spray-in.
Altair and its partners are currently
actively marketing the CDTS to shipowners and working with shipyards and tank fabricators to investigate fabrication and integration solutions. NA
concept design for 300m LOA and 49m beam restriction
Authors Thomas Lamb (Emeritus Research Scientist and Adjunct Professor, Univ. of Michigan, Ann Arbor), is the original inventor of the CDTS. Regu Ramoo (VP of Engineering at Altair ProductDesign), is the CDTS program manager.
The Naval Architect March 2016
25
Feature 1
Page 1 |
Page 2 |
Page 3 |
Page 4 |
Page 5 |
Page 6 |
Page 7 |
Page 8 |
Page 9 |
Page 10 |
Page 11 |
Page 12 |
Page 13 |
Page 14 |
Page 15 |
Page 16 |
Page 17 |
Page 18 |
Page 19 |
Page 20 |
Page 21 |
Page 22 |
Page 23 |
Page 24 |
Page 25 |
Page 26 |
Page 27 |
Page 28 |
Page 29 |
Page 30 |
Page 31 |
Page 32 |
Page 33 |
Page 34 |
Page 35 |
Page 36 |
Page 37 |
Page 38 |
Page 39 |
Page 40 |
Page 41 |
Page 42 |
Page 43 |
Page 44 |
Page 45 |
Page 46 |
Page 47 |
Page 48