This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
box mechanism, which attempts to give an equity value to a deal before


completion by working


off an historical balance sheet, as a particular problem in slowing deals.


But he argued that the transaction market was close to an inflexion point. “Assets are starved of capital to reposition and banks can’t do it,” he said. Deals were in part taking longer as standards of due diligence are now set where they should be. “Deals done in 2006 to 2008 were done without due diligence,” said Taljaard. Adrian Turner, managing director of Crownway Capital Europe, said: “You always know you’re at the top of the real estate cycle when banks get big into hotels.” Turner contrasted Europe with the US with the latter seeing confidence coming back. “REITs are buying for increased yield. It is starting to change pricing in the US.” Parts of Europe were still scary,


said Turner. Ireland still had an intravenous drip in place from the European Central Bank. But the country has taken huge pain already: “If the rest of the world took on in the same way, the crisis would be over,” said Turner. Taljaard said that his firm had taken part in the Maybourne refinancing which had been led by a US mortgage REIT. “The talk about insurance companies filling [the debt finance] void has not happened,” said Taljaard, adding that for insurance companies to come in to the market it was necessary to synthetically solve the requirements they had in terms of the nature and shape of returns.


Bob Silk, relationship director


at Barclays Corporate, admitted that banks generally wanted a “bullet proof codpiece”. The big


fear


for buyers was


“catching


a falling knife” but Silk was confident we are near the bottom: “I’m fairly convinced that in five years we will look back and think ‘I can’t believe it was so cheap’.” Silk added that he expects to


be busy this year and was already discussing


“four big deals”.


Domestic UK lenders had worked out that they need to lend more money, he said. There won’t be a return to the “lunacy” of 2005 to 2007 but lending “will slowly but surely ease up”. Derek Gammage, head of hotels EMEA for CBRE, was sceptical that Asian buyers would feature heavily in the near future. “The premise of Asian buyers is that they are going to buy cheap,” he said but there were better opportunities nearer home. More likely buyers were Americans who had access to cheaper debt. More deals were likely to be done as “the stars were now aligned”: interest rate swaps had burnt off; debt was stretched and therefore motivated; equity was realistic; and banks had taken the impairment. Gammage said that banks were selling packages of debt and there would be pure hospitality debt trading.


“Consensual solutions


of three years ago are not so consensual today,” he added.


HA Perspective: Are we finally at the point where deals start in earnest? The short answer is no. But it seems highly likely that there will be more movement than we have seen for some time. At the outset of this crisis, Hotel Analyst divided the problem loans held by banks into three categories: basket cases, such as GuestInvest, which needed the plug pulling immediately;


fundamentally


sound businesses that had some issues with the capital structure, such as Mint; and profoundly


indebted companies that needed serious adjustments to their capital stack, of which De Vere Hotels was a case. In this context it made sense for the receivers to go in immediately at GuestInvest, which they did, and for the most robust companies to trade, which was the case for Mint. While the debt holders got out with their cash back in the Mint deal it was, and is, unlikely to be the case in many other deals. Robert Cook, CEO at De Vere, was also speaking at the Ernst & Young event. He said that his bankers Lloyds had been generous to him in terms of capex but “we are playing catch- up for the last three years”. Hugh Taylor, chief executive


at Michels & Taylor, said that in general it was hard to look at a capex programme that offered


a return. If you were


able to reposition and work in an extended or different market then there is an opportunity that makes good business sense. In this context, lenders who are in effective control of assets need to ask themselves whether they are the right people to oversee such a repositioning. Even if existing management can be incentivised to provide “cover”, debt is still taking on equity like risks. Given


that the margins for


lending on plain vanilla deals are at historic highs (despite what the lenders might try to tell you) it makes more sense to take a write- down on the bad deals to free up the balance sheet to lend on deals that are much less risky. It is a quirk of human nature


that losses are felt far more than gains. Now looks the time for banks to steel themselves for tough decisions.


Hotel Analyst


Having read these four pages of Hotel Analyst we hope you want to find out more.


To sample visit: www.hotelanalyst.co.uk/sample For more details visit: www.hotelanalyst.co.uk or call +44 (0)20 8870 6388


WWW.SLEEPERMAGAZINE.COM MARCH / APRIL 2013 117


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160  |  Page 161  |  Page 162  |  Page 163  |  Page 164