This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
3. Causation – an “officer” is only


deemed to have suffered a “personal injury sustained in the line of duty,” a statutory prerequisite of a PSOB death claim, if the death happened “as a direct and proximate result of a heart attack or stroke. 42 USC §3796. 4. Qualifying Activities – The pre-


sumption applies only if the officer was “engaged in a situation, and such en- gagement involved non-routine stressful or strenuous physical law enforcement, fire suppression, rescue, hazardous material response, emergency medical services, prison security, disaster relief, or other emergency activity” or while participating “in a training exercise, and


such participation involved non-routine stressful or strenuous physical activity. 42 USC § 3796. Qualifying activities do not include “actions of a clerical, ad- ministrative, or non-manual nature.” 42 USC §3796. A 2007 Justice Department directive offers insight into what the decision makers regard as “non-routine.” “No activity,” it begins, “shall be under- stood as routine solely by virtue of being described by the public safety agency as ‘routine’ or ‘ordinary.’” Rather, when gauging “routiness,” the “determination rests less on the frequency with which it may be performed than by its stressful or strenuous character.” “Responding to an emergency call,” it counsels further,


“shall presumptively be treated as non- routine.” With regard to the going and coming rule, “authorized commuting,” use of an official vehicle or a personal one for official use, is covered. 28 C.F.R. 32.2. 5. On Duty or within 24 Hours: The


presumption applies if the officer died as a result of a heart attack or stroke suffered “while engaging or participat- ing” in the qualifying activities, “while still on duty after participating,” or “not later than 24 hours after so engaging or participating.” Id. 6. Rebutting Evidence – The presump-





  


 


   


 





 


 


 


   


    


 


     


tion can be “overcome by competent medical evidence to the contrary.” Id. The same October 2007 PSOB directive offers insight into when an applicant will be met with a request for medical documentation, perhaps to rebut the presumption. If “there is nothing in the claim file that affirmatively suggests that something other than the line-of- duty heart activity may have caused the fatal heart attack or stroke, or that it was more likely than not that the hart attack or stroke would was imminent, no medical history records shall be requested of the claimant.” In reaching this “affirmative suggestion,” the “mere presence of cardio vascular disease risk factors (even extremely severe), shall not be considered unless information in the claim file itself affirmatively sug- gests that the claimant’s decedent – (a) actually knew or should have known of such a presence; and (b) appears to have worsened or aggravated the same by his own intentional or reckless be- havior.” The records, when requested, the bulletin advises, will be “reviewed for mitigating evidence in favor of the claim.” When there is a medical records request from the Board, except in “rare circumstances,” the request will be for up to “three years of history.” 7. Beneficiaries – Unlike Maryland


Workers’ Compensation, which condi- tions survivors’ benefits on degrees of dependency, the PSOB creates classed of beneficiaries, according to the rela- tionships between the claimants and the deceased. For example, if there is a


56 Trial Reporter Fall 2008


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76