This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
PRIMARY AND SECONDARY SCHOOLS | BYOD SPECIAL


“No student has ever broken their own device. And generally what they own is better than what we could provide”


devices from bringing viruses into the school system. “Security was also a huge concern for us,” says Brian. “We needed it to be completely secure, with no chance of it being hacked.” The students' server is therefore separate from the staff one, so sensitive information is not accessible. As well as keeping the network safe, the ability to


keep devices secure is also vital, so the issue of storage needs to be considered. LapSafe Products manufactures trolleys and lockers for just this very purpose, and which have the added bonus of being able to charge devices too. “It's important to ensure that you provide the right kind of storage, security and availability of lockers as well as a number of charging methods to support the multitude of devices available today,” says Mark Exley, LapSafe's Business Development Director. "Not all devices are the same, and that must be


considered when introducing BYOD into a school; you must provide a universal solution that is manageable, scalable and, of course, cost effective.” The company will work closely with a school and its staff to establish a BYOD storage and charging solution that works for them. There are clearly a myriad of positive benefits of such a system, but what problems has Tibshelf encountered? “Student misuse and how to deal with it is the biggest issue,” explains Brian. “So we made it clear from the beginning that the teacher has to ask students to bring out their devices – it's not a given assumption in every lesson.


BYOD – THE PROS AND CONS AT A GLANCE


NAM AUT QUASPEL MINT PROS


 Devices are an everyday part of life today and students always have them in their pocket or bag


 Students tend to look after their own devices better than school property


 It allows students to have access to the latest technology


at no cost to the school


 It gives the ability to be spontaneous in lessons


 Having students use devices that they are familiar with means there's no need for an introduction on how to use them


CONS


 Student misuse of the system and accessing inappropriate content


 Resistance from teachers in integrating it into their lessons


 Overloading and compromising the safety of the school system


 Keeping devices safe from theft


 Applications not working across all platforms


28 | www.edtechnology.co.uk | @Educ_Technology


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74