This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
Handbook of Forensic Psychiatric Practice in Capital Cases


good sense of the flow of the interview, as well as clues, perhaps, as to the presence of formal thought disorder, the preoccupations of the defendant and how he responded to challenge. Alternatively, the defendant’s account can be summarised and re-arranged to fit the structure preferred by the author. However, whichever approach is adopted, it is important to quote verbatim things said by him that could be of major legal relevance.


Whatever method is chosen, it is important to make clear what the defendant volunteered and what information was elicited by way of direct questioning.


Writing in terms ‘Mr A said….Mr A told me…’ makes it clear that it is his account that is being reported. However, this approach runs the risk of making the report stilted and difficult to read. And the use of direct quotes from an interview can bring the patient to life for the reader, allowing the voice of the patient to emerge.


Recording the questions asked with the defendant’s responses can provide a real insight into how he reacted within the interview. However, recording both question and answer accurately is difficult during an interview, unless the interviewer is skilled at some form of shorthand, and what a defendant says sometimes makes little sense on paper in the absence of body language and intonation (although this can be described alongside the quote). Tat said, again it may be particularly important to record verbatim questions and answers relating to legally important matters.


Te patient’s emotional responses should be noted; for example, the observation that they became tearful when talking about their dead dog but not their dying mother might be of significance. Again, though, there is a danger that this extra information will hinder the flow of the account. A solution is to place the emotional reaction of the defendant in brackets next to the point of the interview where it was witnessed.


Mental state examination


Te length of the mental state examination that is recorded varies between authors, from a few lines to many paragraphs. Some include only positive findings. However, there is a need to report important negatives too, for example the absence of psychotic signs. Tis said, it might not be necessary to list every typical schizophrenic sign that is not present; it is only the absence of signs that one might have suspected could have been present that should be noted.


Te detail in which the cognitive examination is recorded will vary from case to case. In most, it will probably suffice to report that there were no gross abnormalities, and to give some indication of the defendant’s general level of intelligence. Where cognition is at issue, the account will be detailed.


Information from other sources


Where medical or psychological investigations – including those described in reports provided to lawyers or the court – have been carried out on the defendant other than by the doctor reporting, the findings relevant to the opinion expressed by the doctor should be summarised. Tis is necessary


64


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156