This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
WOMEN IN THE RAJYA SABHA


Mahatma Gandhi (left) expressed regret that political parties were not doing enought to send sufficent numbers of women to legislative bodies; The first Indian Prime Minister, Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru (right), championed the advancement of women in the Rayja Sabha.


have long been convinced that a nation’s progress is intimately connected with the status of its women.” The observations of Pandit Nehru articulated in the mid-1950s brought out the significance of this legislation which the Rajya Sabha had the distinction of taking up first. In preferring the Council of States to initiate those historic Bills, the government of the day was underlining the image of the Council of States as a legislative nursery for progressive ideas and forces and for taking steps to advance women and heighten the prestige of our country at the global level.


The preferred Chamber for women’s legislation Five and half decades after the Rajya Sabha was chosen to introduce the Hindu reform Bills, it fell to it again to provide leadership for passing the Constitution (Hundred and Eighth Amendment) Bill 2008 for providing adequate space to women in the political field. While the House took


courageous and bold initiatives in securing the social and economic rights of women in the middle of the twentieth century, it took the giant leap for political


empowerment of women in the first decade of the twenty-first century. With the introduction and passage of the constitutional amendment in the Rajya Sabha to reserve 33 per cent seats for women in the Lok Sabha and state Legislatures, the nation realized that the Council of States as a permanent Chamber of our Parliament is of monumental significance in successfully taking up legislation which revolutionizes polity and society and which often is not accepted by some social and political groups. When a legislative proposal is introduced in the Rajya Sabha it does not lapse as, unlike the Lok Sabha, the upper House is not subject to dissolution. Its continuation as a permanent Chamber of our Parliament is its unique and enduring feature and any legislation originating there


312 | The Parliamentarian | 2011: Issue Four


remains alive. While piloting the Report of the Union Constitution Committee in the Constituent Assembly, Shri N. Gopalaswamy Ayyangar had stated that the role of the second Chamber was not to be a clog to either legislation or administration. The idea of a second Chamber is rooted in the fundamental notion that it would prevent hasty legislation. The Rajya Sabha has certainly prevented numerous hasty laws. However there are vested interests inside and outside Parliament which often prevent introduction of legislation envisaging bold social, economic and political reforms. In the particular instance of the legislation concerning the reservation of seats for women, the Lower House of our Parliament witnessed violent resistance when it was introduced in the 11th, 12th and 13th Lok Sabhas. It is in such situations that the Rajya Sabha, created to prevent hasty legislation, is preferred by the government to introduce Bills of far-reaching social and economic significance


to hasten the process of making these into laws for the benefit of society and nation. The role of Rajya Sabha assumes critical significance for expanding the scope of democracy and making it more inclusive and broad-based. The Speaker of the lower House, Hon. Somnath Chatterjee, in his valedictory remarks at the end of the last session of the 14th Lok Sabha on 26 February 2009 stated:


“Personally it is a matter of great regret to me that we have not been able, during my tenure, to pass the Women’s Reservation Bill which to my mind would have gone a long way towards genuine and effective empowerment of 50 per cent of our population. The Women’s Reservation Bill has now been introduced in the Rajya Sabha during the 2008 Budget Session to ensure that the Bill does not lapse with the dissolution of the 14th Lok Sabha.”


With the introduction of such legislation in the Rajya Sabha, it is


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160