This page contains a Flash digital edition of a book.
WOMEN IN THE RAJYA SABHA


Women of the Rayja Sabha: The role of the former Deputy Chairman of the Rayja Sabha, Dr the Hon. Najma Heptullah, (left) was significant in guaranteeing female representation in the House; and Smt. Sonia Gandhi, MP, President of the Indian National Congress Party (right).


significant development after women got the right to vote. Several Members of the Rajya Sabha, cutting across party lines, while participating in the debate on the Bill, referred to Dr B.R. Ambedkar, the principal architect of our constitution. Shri D. Raja remarked that gender equality must be the objective of the entire Parliament and nation. He fortified his argument by quoting Dr Ambedkar who in his address to thousands of women belonging to the depressed classes had said: “I measure the progress of community by the degree of progress which women have achieved.”


Dr Ambedkar, as the then Law Minister of India, drafted the Hindu Code Bill which was supposed to ensure women their legitimate rights which were denied to them for centuries. Its enactment would


have brought about an


unprecedented social revolution in our country spearheaded by women.


Many organizations and conservative sections of society came to the streets and shouted “Down with the Hindu Code Bill”. They were against equality and equal opportunities for women. Our first Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was saddened by those developments. In a letter to Chief Ministers he wrote that even “as a considerable majority in Parliament at that time wanted to pass the Bill with minor


modifications, they were helpless before a determined minority and therefore had to concede defeat for the moment”. Those words of Prime Minister Nehru sound so contemporary for our own time when the Constitution (One Hundred Eighth Amendment) Bill


2008 is facing stiff opposition only from a small group.


The Nehru government’s intention to make the Hindu Code Bill the law of the land was best reflected when it was incorporated in the address of the then President of India, Dr Rajendra Prasad, to both Houses of Parliament assembled together in 1952.


However, the arduous exercise of DrAmbedkar to frame the Hindu Code Bill did not go in vain. Its progressive content and reformative features commanded attention of all right-thinking people from across the nation. Country-wide debate on those aspects moulded public opinion in its favour.


Hindu Law Reform Bills and Nehru’s observations Eventually many Bills incorporating


the basic ingredients of the Hindu Code were introduced in the Rajya Sabha. The Hindu Marriage and Divorce Bill 1952, The Hindu Minority and Guardianship Bill 1953, The Hindu Succession Bill 1954, and The Hindu Adoptions and Maintenance Bill 1956 became law after originating in the Council of States.


It is of extraordinary education to know that then Prime Minister Pandit Jawaharlal Nehru was making profound remarks after the passage of each and every Bill introduced in the Rajya Sabha for protecting the rights of women. When those Bills were passed he observed in a letter to the Chief Ministers on 15 June 1956 “there is something revolutionary about them” and “they have broken the barrier of ages and cleared the way somewhat for our womenfolk to progress”. Then he remarked: “I


The Parliamentarian | 2011: Issue Four | 311


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76  |  Page 77  |  Page 78  |  Page 79  |  Page 80  |  Page 81  |  Page 82  |  Page 83  |  Page 84  |  Page 85  |  Page 86  |  Page 87  |  Page 88  |  Page 89  |  Page 90  |  Page 91  |  Page 92  |  Page 93  |  Page 94  |  Page 95  |  Page 96  |  Page 97  |  Page 98  |  Page 99  |  Page 100  |  Page 101  |  Page 102  |  Page 103  |  Page 104  |  Page 105  |  Page 106  |  Page 107  |  Page 108  |  Page 109  |  Page 110  |  Page 111  |  Page 112  |  Page 113  |  Page 114  |  Page 115  |  Page 116  |  Page 117  |  Page 118  |  Page 119  |  Page 120  |  Page 121  |  Page 122  |  Page 123  |  Page 124  |  Page 125  |  Page 126  |  Page 127  |  Page 128  |  Page 129  |  Page 130  |  Page 131  |  Page 132  |  Page 133  |  Page 134  |  Page 135  |  Page 136  |  Page 137  |  Page 138  |  Page 139  |  Page 140  |  Page 141  |  Page 142  |  Page 143  |  Page 144  |  Page 145  |  Page 146  |  Page 147  |  Page 148  |  Page 149  |  Page 150  |  Page 151  |  Page 152  |  Page 153  |  Page 154  |  Page 155  |  Page 156  |  Page 157  |  Page 158  |  Page 159  |  Page 160