This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
KEY MESSAGES K


EY MESSAGES for Payment of Ecosystem services and the way forward.


Ecosystem-based economic development is needed. Te cur- rent economic model driving the global economy is not sustain- able. A new approach to economic development and human ac- tivities is consequently necessary, underpinned by ecosystems.


PES is a proven concept which can reduce negative economic patterns, support sustainable development and increase well- being. It is not a remedy for all ills and must be applied care- fully, to avoid potential negative effects.


Governments can play a more prominent role in stimulating demand for environmental services and promoting different markets by establishing comprehensive regulatory and ena- bling frameworks.


Targeted institutional design is needed to support PES schemes. Tis includes efforts to identify and match the pro- viders and beneficiaries of ecosystem services.


Non-existent or ill-defined land rights can hamper PES. Te poorest of the poor oſten do not own or control any land. Tere are also issues relating to overlapping and disputed claims to land or where land is owned collectively by various groups.


Many PES schemes tend to focus on a single ecosystem serv- ice. However, integrating various ecosystem services could lead to more viable PES schemes. Functioning schemes seem to be moving towards a bundled approach.


Scope for assessing market prices for environmental services differs greatly from one market segment to another. In the


68 VITAL GRAPHICS ON PAYMENT FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES


carbon sequestration market, commodities can be traded, but economic valuation in the landscape beauty and biodiversity markets is far more challenging. Tis should not lead to the ‘easier’ ecosystem services gaining more importance.


Tere are great differences in the pricing of services within each market segment. Te development of prices should in- clude the best available science, but most importantly, it needs to be based on mutual understanding between the service provider and beneficiary.


It is essential for actors to understand the value of conserving ecosystems. Individuals and communities providing or selling environmental services must be able to understand what is entailed and how they will benefit.


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76