This book includes a plain text version that is designed for high accessibility. To use this version please follow this link.
MARKET S EGMENTS


Case study:


FARMERS AND FOREST DWELLERS IN MEXICO


Te Scolel Te Plan Vivo project involves more than 670 pro- ducers and nearly 50 communities in the central and northern Chiapas and northeast Oaxaca areas of southern Mexico. It is a model for community-based, sustainable land use and seques- tration projects in developing countries.


Te project, established in 1996 and operating on an entirely commercial, self-sufficient basis since 2002, aims to deliver a wide range of CO2


sequestration and emissions-reduction ben-


efits from changes in land use activities. Local people involved in the scheme – the so-called producers – combine existing land uses and agricultural activities with sequestration projects such as the creation and restoration of indigenous forest and wood- land as well as agroforestry activities. Most are small-scale farm- ers, forest dwellers and other land users with recognised land tenure or user rights. Altogether the Plan Vivo project brings together about 2 400 Mayan and Mestizo families.


Under the scheme, sequestration and emission reductions are ‘bundled’ together with social and other benefits: together the delivery of these services combines to make up credits – Plan Vivo certificates – paid to producers. Over the years the project has developed rigorous carbon accounting procedures with producers being paid for the supply of ecosystem services only at the end of a certification and monitoring process.


Project coordinators – usually local or national NGOs, or non- profit organizations – recruit producers and coordinate training. Tey negotiate purchase-contracts with buyers of credits in the carbon market and oversee carbon payments too. Plan Vivo is estimated to have been responsible for sequestering many thou- sands of tonnes of CO2


. By the end of 2010 the project had sold


more than 432 166 Verified Emission Reduction offset credits (VERs) on the carbon market. It has also brought about major changes in land use and various social benefits.


42 VITAL GRAPHICS ON PAYMENT FOR ECOSYSTEM SERVICES


Page 1  |  Page 2  |  Page 3  |  Page 4  |  Page 5  |  Page 6  |  Page 7  |  Page 8  |  Page 9  |  Page 10  |  Page 11  |  Page 12  |  Page 13  |  Page 14  |  Page 15  |  Page 16  |  Page 17  |  Page 18  |  Page 19  |  Page 20  |  Page 21  |  Page 22  |  Page 23  |  Page 24  |  Page 25  |  Page 26  |  Page 27  |  Page 28  |  Page 29  |  Page 30  |  Page 31  |  Page 32  |  Page 33  |  Page 34  |  Page 35  |  Page 36  |  Page 37  |  Page 38  |  Page 39  |  Page 40  |  Page 41  |  Page 42  |  Page 43  |  Page 44  |  Page 45  |  Page 46  |  Page 47  |  Page 48  |  Page 49  |  Page 50  |  Page 51  |  Page 52  |  Page 53  |  Page 54  |  Page 55  |  Page 56  |  Page 57  |  Page 58  |  Page 59  |  Page 60  |  Page 61  |  Page 62  |  Page 63  |  Page 64  |  Page 65  |  Page 66  |  Page 67  |  Page 68  |  Page 69  |  Page 70  |  Page 71  |  Page 72  |  Page 73  |  Page 74  |  Page 75  |  Page 76